Literature DB >> 16036700

Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils.

Paul Root Wolpe1, Kenneth R Foster, Daniel D Langleben.   

Abstract

Detection of deception and confirmation of truth telling with conventional polygraphy raised a host of technical and ethical issues. Recently, newer methods of recording electromagnetic signals from the brain show promise in permitting the detection of deception or truth telling. Some are even being promoted as more accurate than conventional polygraphy. While the new technologies raise issues of personal privacy, acceptable forensic application, and other social issues, the focus of this paper is the technical limitations of the developing technology. Those limitations include the measurement validity of the new technologies, which remains largely unknown. Another set of questions pertains to the psychological paradigms used to model or constrain the target behavior. Finally, there is little standardization in the field, and the vulnerability of the techniques to countermeasures is unknown. Premature application of these technologies outside of research settings should be resisted, and the social conversation about the appropriate parameters of its civil, forensic, and security use should begin.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16036700     DOI: 10.1080/15265160590923367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  23 in total

1.  The lie of fMRI: an examination of the ethics of a market in lie detection using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Amy E White
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-09

2.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  [Lie detection and mind reading: is there a use for fMRI?: A critical survey and reflection].

Authors:  M Ruchsow; L Hermle; M Kober
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Lies in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  John J Palmieri; Theodore A Stern
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

6.  Neuroscience, neuropolitics and neuroethics: the complex case of crime, deception and FMRI.

Authors:  Stuart Henry; Dena Plemmons
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The Puzzle of Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Diagnosis: Technology and Nosology in an Evolving Discipline.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; Seth J Gillihan
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-08

8.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Human enhancement and communication: on meaning and shared understanding.

Authors:  Laura Cabrera; John Weckert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; Jane Campbell Moriarty
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2013-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.