Literature DB >> 15301611

A replication study of the neural correlates of deception.

Frank Andrew Kozel1, Tamara M Padgett, Mark S George.   

Abstract

The authors attempted to replicate prior group brain correlates of deception and improve on the consistency of individual results. Healthy, right-handed adults were instructed to tell the truth or to lie while being imaged in a 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI significance maps were generated for subjects giving a deceptive answer minus a truthful answer (lie minus true) and the reverse (true minus lie). The lie minus true group analysis (n = 10) revealed significant activation in 5 regions, consistent with a previous study (right orbitofrontal, inferior frontal, middle frontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, and left middle frontal), with no significant activation for true minus lie. Individual results of the lie minus true condition were variable. Results show that functional MRI is a reasonable tool with which to study deception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301611     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  22 in total

1.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.

Authors:  Shawn E Christ; David C Van Essen; Jason M Watson; Lindsay E Brubaker; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Applications of neuroscience in criminal law: legal and methodological issues.

Authors:  John B Meixner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  On the use and misuse of genomic and neuroimaging science in forensic psychiatry: current roles and future directions.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; Joshua W Buckholtz
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2011-07

7.  The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.

Authors:  Paola Pinti; Andrea Devoto; Isobel Greenhalgh; Ilias Tachtsidis; Paul W Burgess; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoqing Gao; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Steven J Laken; Kevin A Johnson; Bryant Boren; Kimberly S Mapes; Paul S Morgan; Mark S George
Journal:  Open Forensic Sci J       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Toshikatsu Fujii; Kazumi Hirayama; Atsushi Takeda; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Toshiyuki Ishioka; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Kyoko Suzuki; Yasuto Itoyama; Shoki Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.