Literature DB >> 28355431

State Variation in the Receipt of a Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women Who Received a Diagnosis of Invasive Unilateral Early-Stage Breast Cancer in the United States, 2004-2012.

Rebecca Nash1, Michael Goodman1, Chun Chieh Lin2, Rachel A Freedman3, Laura S Dominici4, Kevin Ward1, Ahmedin Jemal2.   

Abstract

Importance: The use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPMs) among patients with invasive unilateral breast cancer has increased substantially during the past decade in the United States despite the lack of evidence for survival benefit. However, whether this trend varies by state or whether it is correlated with changes in proportions of reconstructive surgery among these patients is unclear. Objective: To determine state variation in the temporal trend and in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 1.2 million women 20 years of age or older diagnosed with invasive unilateral early-stage breast cancer and treated with surgery from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2012, in 45 states and the District of Columbia as compiled by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2015, to August 31, 2016. Exposure: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal changes in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery by age and state, overall and in relation to changes in the proportions of those who underwent reconstructive surgery.
Results: Among the 1 224 947 women with early-stage breast cancer treated with surgery, the proportion who underwent a CPM nationally increased between 2004 and 2012 from 3.6% (4013 of 113 001) to 10.4% (12 890 of 124 231) for those 45 years or older and from 10.5% (1879 of 17 862) to 33.3% (5237 of 15 745) for those aged 20 to 44 years. The increase was evident in all states, although the magnitude of the increase varied substantially across states. For example, among women 20 to 44 years of age, the proportion who underwent a CPM from 2004-2006 to 2010-2012 increased from 14.9% (317 of 2121) to 24.8% (436 of 1755) (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.46-1.89) in New Jersey compared with an increase from 9.8% (162 of 1657) to 32.2% (495 of 1538) (PR, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.80-3.88) in Virginia. In this age group, CPM proportions for the period from 2010 to 2012 were over 42% in the contiguous states of Nebraska, Missouri, Colorado, Iowa, and South Dakota. From 2004 to 2012, the proportion of reconstructive surgical procedures among women aged 20 to 44 years who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and received a CPM increased in many states; however, it did not correlate with the proportion of women who received a CPM. Conclusions and Relevance: The increase in the proportion of CPMs among women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer treated with surgery varied substantially across states. Notably, in 5 contiguous Midwest states, nearly half of young women with invasive early-stage breast cancer underwent a CPM from 2010 to 2012. Future studies should examine the reasons for the geographic variation and increasing trend in the use of CPMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28355431      PMCID: PMC5831458          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  54 in total

1.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia F Borges; Bryce Larsen; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Andrew K Stewart; David J Winchester; David P Winchester
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Association between contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer outcomes by hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Abenaa M Brewster; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker; Wenli Dong; Susan K Peterson; Scott B Cantor; Melissa Crosby; Yu Shen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; D N Danforth; K H Cowan; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; L Pierce; M E Lippman; A S Lichter; E Glatstein; P Okunieff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Association of shared decision-making with type of breast cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Myung Kyung Lee; Dong Young Noh; Seok Jin Nam; Se Hyun Ahn; Byeong Woo Park; Eun Sook Lee; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Income level and regional policies, underlying factors associated with unwarranted variations in conservative breast cancer surgery in Spain.

Authors:  Manuel Ridao-López; Sandra García-Armesto; Begoña Abadía-Taira; Salvador Peiró-Moreno; Enrique Bernal-Delgado
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Additional Considerations and a Framework for Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Deanna J Attai; Steven L Chen; Hiram S Cody; Jill R Dietz; Sheldon M Feldman; Caprice C Greenberg; Rena B Kass; Jeffrey Landercasper; Valerie Lemaine; Fiona MacNeill; Julie A Margenthaler; David H Song; Alicia C Staley; Lee G Wilke; Shawna C Willey; Katharine A Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  24 in total

1.  Discussions about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among surgical oncology providers and women with sporadic breast cancer: a content analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Abenaa M Brewster; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer: what to discuss with patients.

Authors:  Giacomo Montagna; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Factors Affecting Surgical Decisions in Newly Diagnosed Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Mary L Greaney; Andrea F Patenaude; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Predictors of genetic testing uptake in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mary K Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Gillian Hooker; Shawna Willey; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Tiffani DeMarco; Suzanne O'Neill; Savannah Binion; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 5.  Trends in the Cost of Cancer Care: Beyond Drugs.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Amy N Luckenbaugh; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patient-reported outcomes among women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing breast conservation versus single or double mastectomy.

Authors:  Catherine Pesce; Jennifer Jaffe; Kristine Kuchta; Katharine Yao; Mark Sisco
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Longitudinal Study of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Surgery in Women with Unilateral Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David W Lim; Helene Retrouvey; Isabel Kerrebijn; Kate Butler; Anne C O'Neill; Tulin D Cil; Toni Zhong; Stefan O P Hofer; David R McCready; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Canada follows the US in the rise of bilateral mastectomies for unilateral breast cancer: a 23-year population cohort study.

Authors:  L Findlay-Shirras; I Lima; G Smith; M Clemons; A Arnaout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prospective Study of Psychosocial Outcomes of Having Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Women With Nonhereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Susan K Peterson; Yu Shen; Isabelle Bedrosian; Dalliah M Black; Alastair M Thompson; Jonathan C Nelson; Sarah M DeSnyder; Robert L Cook; Kelly K Hunt; Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Wenli Dong; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Clinical Decision-Making in Patients with Variant of Uncertain Significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes.

Authors:  Jessemae L Welsh; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; Abigail S Thomas; Jodie A Cogswell; Fergus J Couch; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.