Literature DB >> 26100841

Imaging for distant metastases in women with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Demetrios Simos1, Christina Catley1, Carl van Walraven1, Angel Arnaout1, Christopher M Booth1, Matthew McInnes1, Dean Fergusson1, Susan Dent1, Mark Clemons2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend that imaging to detect metastatic disease not be performed in the majority of patients with early-stage breast cancer who are asymptomatic. We aimed to determine whether practice patterns in Ontario conform with these recommendations.
METHODS: We used provincial registry data to identify a population-based cohort of Ontario women in whom early-stage, operable breast cancer was diagnosed between 2007 and 2012. We then determined whether imaging of the skeleton, thorax, and abdomen or pelvis had been performed within 3 months of tissue diagnosis. We calculated rates of confirmatory imaging of the same body site.
RESULTS: Of 26,547 patients with early-stage disease, 22,811 (85.9%) had at least one imaging test, and a total of 83,249 imaging tests were performed (mean of 3.7 imaging tests per patient imaged). Among patients with pathologic stage I and II disease, imaging was performed in 79.6% (10,921/13,724) and 92.7% (11,882/12,823) of cases, respectively. Of all imaging tests, 19,784 (23.8%) were classified as confirmatory investigations. Imaging was more likely for patients who were younger, had greater comorbidity, had tumours of higher grade or stage or had undergone preoperative breast ultrasonography, mastectomy or surgery in the community setting.
INTERPRETATION: Despite recommendations from multiple international guidelines, most Ontario women with early-stage breast cancer underwent imaging to detect distant metastases. Inappropriate imaging in asymptomatic patients with early-stage disease is costly and may lead to harm. The use of population datasets will allow investigators to evaluate whether or not strategies to implement practice guidelines lead to meaningful and sustained change in physician practice.
© 2015 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26100841      PMCID: PMC4562856          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  20 in total

1.  Are Physicians Choosing Wisely When Imaging for Distant Metastases in Women With Operable Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  M E Brennan; N Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications.

Authors:  F Puglisi; A Follador; A M Minisini; G G Cardellino; S Russo; C Andreetta; S Di Terlizzi; A Piga
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

Authors:  D Davis; M A O'Brien; N Freemantle; F M Wolf; P Mazmanian; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Baseline staging tests in primary breast cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  R E Myers; M Johnston; K Pritchard; M Levine; T Oliver
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Current and future role of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Gottfried E Konecny; Stefan Paepke; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Baseline radiological staging in primary breast cancer: impact of educational interventions on adherence to published guidelines.

Authors:  Elaine McWhirter; Geetha Yogendran; Frances Wright; George Dranitsaris M Pharm; Mark Clemons
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Advanced diagnostic breast cancer imaging: variation and patterns of care in Washington state.

Authors:  Laura S Gold; Diana S M Buist; Elizabeth T Loggers; Ruth Etzioni; Larry Kessler; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Ian D Graham; Angel Arnaout; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Sasha Mazzarello; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-04-05
View more
  17 in total

1.  Physicians don't follow guidelines: What are we to do?

Authors:  Don Eby
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Investigations for patients with early-stage breast cancer: oversetting the stage.

Authors:  Daniel Rayson; Geoff Porter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Does adjuvant radiation therapy benefit women with small mammography-detected breast cancers?

Authors:  K Jerzak; N Dudalski; K Pritchard; P Sun; S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Unwarranted imaging for distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I and II breast cancer

Authors:  Sasha Lupichuk; Derek Tilley; Brae Surgeoner; Karen King; Anil Abraham Joy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Cost implications of unwarranted imaging for distant metastasis in women with early-stage breast cancer in Ontario.

Authors:  K Thavorn; Z Wang; D Fergusson; S van Katwyk; A Arnaout; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Use and Yield of Baseline Imaging and Laboratory Testing in Stage II Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Hao Guo; Jazmine Sutton; Laura Spring; Jennifer Faig; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Chiara Battelli; Mary Jane Houlihan; Tsai-Chu Yeh; Steven E Come; Nancy U Lin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-22

8.  Breast cancer: The importance of overdiagnosis in breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

Authors:  A Arnaout; N P Varela; M Allarakhia; L Grimard; A Hey; J Lau; L Thain; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Factors associated with imaging in patients with early breast cancer after initial treatment.

Authors:  K Enright; T Desai; R Sutradhar; A Gonzalez; M Powis; N Taback; C M Booth; M E Trudeau; M K Krzyzanowska
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.