Literature DB >> 23942642

Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Michael C Bajema1, Colum D MacKinnon, Michael J Carter, Michael Kennefick, Sam Perlmutter, Anthony N Carlsen.   

Abstract

Targeted reciprocal aiming movements are pervasive in everyday life, but it is unclear how the timing parameters between task elements affect the preparation of these movements. This study used a loud (124 dB) startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) to probe how changes in the pause time between the outward and return components of a reciprocal aiming task affected the preparatory state of the motor system. Participants performed a visually guided wrist extension-flexion task to a target located at 20° from the start position and were instructed to pause the movement within the wrist extension target zone for either 50, 200, or 500 ms. A SAS was presented during 25 % of trials before either the onset of the wrist extension (out) or flexion (return) components of the task to determine how motor preparation was affected by task requirements. Results showed that the presentation of a SAS prior to the initial outward movement led to significantly earlier onsets of both the outward and return components (p < .05), indicating that the pause time in the planned action was pre-planned. For the longer (200, 500 ms) pause-time conditions, a SAS delivered prior to returning from the target region triggered the return portion of the movement early. These findings suggest that the shortest pause-time movement (50 ms) was preplanned as a single action, whereas for reciprocal movements with longer pause times at least the initial part of the movement and the timing of the pause were preplanned and integrated, while the return portion was more independent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942642     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3670-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  The one-target advantage: advanced preparation or online processing?

Authors:  Ann Lavrysen; Werner F Helsen; Digby J Elliott; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements.

Authors:  H Z Zelaznik; B Hawkins; L Kisselburgh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Response preparation and control of movement sequences.

Authors:  I M Franks; P Nagelkerke; M Ketelaars; P Van Donkelaar
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1998-06

Review 6.  Single-joint rapid arm movements in normal subjects and in patients with motor disorders.

Authors:  A Berardelli; M Hallett; J C Rothwell; R Agostino; M Manfredi; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography.

Authors:  P W Hodges; B H Bui
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12

8.  Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments.

Authors:  C J Chamberlin; R A Magill
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 9.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.