Literature DB >> 2489852

Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments.

C J Chamberlin1, R A Magill.   

Abstract

Research investigating the preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses typically has assumed complete programming of the response occurring prior to movement initiation and has made use of a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm. A notable exception is Rosenbaum's work which proposed the Hierarchical Editor (HED) model that is specifically directed toward the control of movements in the choice environment. The purposes of this study were to investigate the assumption of complete programming prior to movement initiation and to compare predictions of the HED model with other programming models. Three experiments are reported in which subjects were required to tap either one, two, or three plates as rapidly as possible in either a simple or choice RT situation. The results were very consistent in these experiments even with several modifications in apparatus and methodology. Of particular interest were effects of movement complexity on RT and movement time (MT) for the first and second segments of the movement (M1 and M2). Choice RT (CRT) results consistently showed no increases in RT as the number of movement segments increased but showed significant increases in M1. For simple RT situations, however, there were small but consistent increases in RT as well as increases in M1 with increases in the number of movement parts. For both CRT and SRT results, small but nonsignificant increases were noted for M2. These results provide evidence for incomplete programming prior to response initiation. Although the SRT data can be accommodated by Henry's theory, the HED model appears to offer the best overall fit for the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2489852     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

1.  Planning short pointing sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Vindras; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The hand's automatic pilot can update visual information while the eye is in motion.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; James T Enns; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The context dependence of grasping movements: an evaluation of possible reasons.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Programming time in serial tapping responses as a function of pathway constraint.

Authors:  B Sidaway; B Schoenfelder-Zohdi; B Moore
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990

6.  Influence of cognitive functions and behavioral context on grasping kinematics.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dual-target interference for the 'automatic pilot' in the dorsal stream.

Authors:  Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; James T Enns; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Tessa Johnson; Gordon Ridgeway; Dustin Luchmee; Joshua Jacob; Shailesh Kantak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.064

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.