| Literature DB >> 23940759 |
Abstract
Organisms living in urban environments are exposed to different environmental conditions compared to their rural conspecifics. Especially anthropogenic noise and artificial night light are closely linked to urbanization and pose new challenges to urban species. Songbirds are particularly affected by these factors, because they rely on the spread of acoustic information and adjust their behaviour to the rhythm of night and day, e.g. time their dawn song according to changing light intensities. Our aim was to clarify the specific contributions of artificial night light and traffic noise on the timing of dawn song of urban European Blackbirds (Turdus merula). We investigated the onset of blackbird dawn song along a steep urban gradient ranging from an urban forest to the city centre of Leipzig, Germany. This gradient of anthropogenic noise and artificial night light was reflected in the timing of dawn song. In the city centre, blackbirds started their dawn song up to 5 hours earlier compared to those in semi-natural habitats. We found traffic noise to be the driving factor of the shift of dawn song into true night, although it was not completely separable from the effects of ambient night light. We additionally included meteorological conditions into the analysis and found an effect on the song onset. Cloudy and cold weather delayed the onset, but cloud cover was assumed to reflect night light emissions, thus, amplified sky luminance and increased the effect of artificial night light. Beside these temporal effects, we also found differences in the spatial autocorrelation of dawn song onset showing a much higher variability in noisy city areas than in rural parks and forests. These findings indicate that urban hazards such as ambient noise and light pollution show a manifold interference with naturally evolved cycles and have significant effects on the activity patterns of urban blackbirds.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23940759 PMCID: PMC3737108 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071476
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Study area in Leipzig with artificial night light (A), noise from car traffic (B) and tramways (C).
(A) represents the study area with its different sites (C1–P6). In the northeast of the study area are the inner city centre (C4) with adjacent tiny parks (C1) and green spaces (C2) and an urban fallow area (C3). To the southwest follows a series of public parks of different sizes (P2– P6) and the urban forest (P1). The whole study area covers 215 ha. The black and white points indicate blackbird song posts in the two seasons 2011 and 2012, respectively. One bird can use more than one song post. The inlay in (A) illustrates the street light densities of the study area and its close vicinity. Noise levels for car traffic (B) and tramways (C) at night are shown for the same area. Noise levels above 60 dB(A) are indicated by orange and red colour.
Number of blackbird song posts at the different study sites.
| Centre | Park & Forest | ||||||||||
| Study site | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | |
|
| 2011 | 22 | 46 | 16 | 10 | 52 | 8 | 37 | 17 | 21 | 8 |
| 2012 | 30 | 20 | 14 | 26 | 83 | 18 | 69 | 23 | 47 | 33 | |
Figure 2Onset of blackbird dawn song along an urbanisation gradient.
If the notches of two boxes do not overlap it is strong evidence that their medians differ.
Model selection results for the subsets and full dataset examining the influence of anthropogenic noise, artificial night light and weather components on the onset of blackbird dawn song.
| Subset | Candidate models |
|
| AIC | ΔAIC |
|
| All data | ||||||
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Habitat, Noi*Ld | 2613 | 11 | 29917.7 | 0.00 | 0.43 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Habitat, Noi*Ld, Cloud*Ld | 2612 | 12 | 29918.6 | 1.03 | 0.26 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Habitat, Moon, Noi*Ld, | 2612 | 12 | 29919.3 | 1.61 | 0.19 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Habitat, Moon, Noi*Ld, Cloud*Ld | 2611 | 13 | 29920.3 | 2.62 | 0.12 | |
| Centre | ||||||
| Noi, Day, Temp, Cloud, Moon | 891 | 9 | 9751.7 | 0.00 | 0.40 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Moon | 890 | 10 | 9751.7 | 0.04 | 0.39 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Moon, Cloud*Ld | 889 | 11 | 9753.6 | 1.91 | 0.15 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Moon, Noi*Ld, Cloud*Ld | 888 | 12 | 9755.6 | 3.90 | 0.06 | |
| Park | ||||||
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Noi*Ld, Cloud*Ld | 1714 | 11 | 19798.8 | 0.00 | 0.47 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Moon, Noi*Ld, Cloud*Ld | 1713 | 12 | 19799.1 | 0.34 | 0.40 | |
| Noi, Ld, Day, Temp, Cloud, Noi*Ld | 1715 | 10 | 19801.3 | 2.49 | 0.13 | |
All models contain a correction factor for spatial autocorrelation and a random intercept to account for repeated measures of individual birds.
Noi – PCA factor noise, Ld – lamp density, Day – Julian date, Temp – temperature, Cloud – cloud cover, Moon – lunar phase; Habitat – habitat factor.
Model selection was based on Akaike’s information criteria (AIC). The parameter df indicates the residual degrees of freedom, K represents the number of parameters in the candidate model and ΔAIC the difference of AIC values to the top-ranking model. Only candidate models with ΔAIC <4 are presented, because they are considered to receive support, and included to calculate Akaike weights (ω).
Figure 3Proposed influence of anthropogenic noise and artificial night light on the song onset of blackbirds.
The smoothing function of anthropogenic noise (here derived from the PCA-factor noise) is a linearly increasing effect on the song onset of blackbirds, whereas the smoothing function of artificial night light (street lamps per ha) approximates an asymptote. The smoothing functions are plotted with the 95% Confidence Interval.
Figure 4Parameter estimates for the influence of explanatory variables on the onset of blackbird dawn song.
The panels illustrate the best models of the (A) overall data set and (B) park/forest and city centre subsets. Negative values indicate an advancing effect on the song onset, positive values a delaying effect. Only explanatory variables included in the best models are shown here. Asterisks represent the levels of significance for the explanatory variables as follows ***P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05.