Literature DB >> 17141614

Cities change the songs of birds.

Hans Slabbekoorn1, Ardie den Boer-Visser.   

Abstract

Worldwide urbanization and the ongoing rise of urban noise levels form a major threat to living conditions in and around cities. Urban environments typically homogenize animal communities, and this results, for example, in the same few bird species' being found everywhere. Insight into the behavioral strategies of the urban survivors may explain the sensitivity of other species to urban selection pressures. Here, we show that songs that are important to mate attraction and territory defense have significantly diverged in great tits (Parus major), a very successful urban species. Urban songs were shorter and sung faster than songs in forests, and often concerned atypical song types. Furthermore, we found consistently higher minimum frequencies in ten out of ten city-forest comparisons from London to Prague and from Amsterdam to Paris. Anthropogenic noise is most likely a dominant factor driving these dramatic changes. These data provide the most consistent evidence supporting the acoustic-adaptation hypothesis since it was postulated in the early seventies. At the same time, they reveal a behavioral plasticity that may be key to urban success and the lack of which may explain detrimental effects on bird communities that live in noisy urbanized areas or along highways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17141614     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  61 in total

1.  Songbirds learn songs least degraded by environmental transmission.

Authors:  Susan Peters; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis).

Authors:  Dominique A Potvin; Kirsten M Parris; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Directional cultural change by modification and replacement of memes.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Image motion environments: background noise for movement-based animal signals.

Authors:  Richard Peters; Jan Hemmi; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Ecological gradient of sexual selection: elevation and song elaboration in finches.

Authors:  Emilie C Snell-Rood; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L).

Authors:  Isabelle C Noirot; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Brains and the city: big-brained passerine birds succeed in urban environments.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Simone Immler; Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer; Johanna Rönn; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.