Literature DB >> 17456449

Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins.

Richard A Fuller1, Philip H Warren, Kevin J Gaston.   

Abstract

Ambient noise interferes with the propagation of acoustic signals through the environment from sender to receiver. Over the past few centuries, urbanization and the development of busy transport networks have led to dramatic increases in the levels of ambient noise with which animal acoustic communications must compete. Here we show that urban European robins Erithacus rubecula, highly territorial birds reliant on vocal communication, reduce acoustic interference by singing during the night in areas that are noisy during the day. The effect of ambient light pollution, to which nocturnal singing in urban birds is frequently attributed, is much weaker than that of daytime noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17456449      PMCID: PMC2390663          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  4 in total

1.  Silencing cities.

Authors:  David Sharp
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Margriet Peet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Signalling through acoustic windows: Nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Environment: whale-call response to masking boat noise.

Authors:  Andrew D Foote; Richard W Osborne; A Rus Hoelzel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  39 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis).

Authors:  Dominique A Potvin; Kirsten M Parris; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  European birds adjust their flight initiation distance to road speed limits.

Authors:  Pierre Legagneux; Simon Ducatez
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Clocks for the city: circadian differences between forest and city songbirds.

Authors:  D M Dominoni; B Helm; M Lehmann; H B Dowse; J Partecke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.

Authors:  Emily J Mockford; Rupert C Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mining noise affects loud call structures and emission patterns of wild black-fronted titi monkeys.

Authors:  M H L Duarte; M C Kaizer; R J Young; M Rodrigues; R S Sousa-Lima
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.163

9.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Nadia Pieretti; Sue Anne Zollinger; Nicole Geberzahn; Jesko Partecke; Ana Catarina Miranda; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Individual spatial responses towards roads: implications for mortality risk.

Authors:  Clara Grilo; Joana Sousa; Fernando Ascensão; Hugo Matos; Inês Leitão; Paula Pinheiro; Monica Costa; João Bernardo; Dyana Reto; Rui Lourenço; Margarida Santos-Reis; Eloy Revilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.