Literature DB >> 11606611

The metabolic cost of birdsong production.

K Oberweger1, F Goller.   

Abstract

The metabolic cost of birdsong production has not been studied in detail but is of importance in our understanding of how selective pressures shape song behavior. We measured rates of oxygen consumption during song in three songbird species, zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), Waterslager canaries (Serinus canaria) and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). These species sing songs with different acoustic and temporal characteristics: short stereotyped song (zebra finch), long song with high temporal complexity (canary) and long song with high acoustic, but low temporal, complexity (starling). In all three species, song slightly increased the rate of oxygen consumption over pre-song levels (1.02-1.36-fold). In zebra finches, the metabolic cost per song motif averaged 1.2 microl g(-1). This cost per motif did not change over the range of song duration measured for the four individuals. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of song production in the species with the temporally most complex song, the canary, was no greater than in the other two species. In starlings, a 16 dB increase in sound intensity was accompanied by a 1.16-fold increase in the rate of oxygen consumption. These data indicate that the metabolic cost of song production in the songbird species studied is no higher than that for other types of vocal behavior in various bird groups. Our analysis shows that the metabolic cost of singing is also similar to that of calling in frogs and of human speech production. However, difficulties with measurements on freely behaving birds in a small respirometry chamber limit the depth of analysis that is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606611     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.19.3379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  28 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis).

Authors:  Dominique A Potvin; Kirsten M Parris; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Heat transfer and the energetic cost of singing by canaries Serinus canaria.

Authors:  S Ward; P J B Slater
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The energetic basis of acoustic communication.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The energetic costs of alternative male reproductive strategies in Xiphophorus nigrensis.

Authors:  Molly Elizabeth Cummings; Rose Gelineau-Kattner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; Franz Goller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  The hidden cost of sexually selected traits: the metabolic expense of maintaining a sexually selected weapon.

Authors:  Ummat Somjee; H Arthur Woods; Meghan Duell; Christine W Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Elaborate visual and acoustic signals evolve independently in a large, phenotypically diverse radiation of songbirds.

Authors:  Nicholas A Mason; Allison J Shultz; Kevin J Burns
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A novel statistical method for behaviour sequence analysis and its application to birdsong.

Authors:  Sarah J Alger; Bret R Larget; Lauren V Riters
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  A cervid vocal fold model suggests greater glottal efficiency in calling at high frequencies.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.