Literature DB >> 23934791

Protein models: the Grand Challenge of protein docking.

Ivan Anishchenko1, Petras J Kundrotas, Alexander V Tuzikov, Ilya A Vakser.   

Abstract

Characterization of life processes at the molecular level requires structural details of protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The number of experimentally determined protein structures accounts only for a fraction of known proteins. This gap has to be bridged by modeling, typically using experimentally determined structures as templates to model related proteins. The fraction of experimentally determined PPI structures is even smaller than that for the individual proteins, due to a larger number of interactions than the number of individual proteins, and a greater difficulty of crystallizing protein-protein complexes. The approaches to structural modeling of PPI (docking) often have to rely on modeled structures of the interactors, especially in the case of large PPI networks. Structures of modeled proteins are typically less accurate than the ones determined by X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance. Thus the utility of approaches to dock these structures should be assessed by thorough benchmarking, specifically designed for protein models. To be credible, such benchmarking has to be based on carefully curated sets of structures with levels of distortion typical for modeled proteins. This article presents such a suite of models built for the benchmark set of the X-ray structures from the Dockground resource (http://dockground.bioinformatics.ku.edu) by a combination of homology modeling and Nudged Elastic Band method. For each monomer, six models were generated with predefined C(α) root mean square deviation from the native structure (1, 2, …, 6 Å). The sets and the accompanying data provide a comprehensive resource for the development of docking methodology for modeled proteins.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmark sets; protein interactions; protein modeling; protein recognition; structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934791      PMCID: PMC4962618          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  31 in total

1.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Dominique Douguet; Huei-Chi Chen; Andrey Tovchigrechko; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Benchmarking of dimeric threading and structure refinement.

Authors:  Vera Grimm; Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-05-15

7.  On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Isaac A Hubner; Adrian K Arakaki; Eugene Shakhnovich; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The continuity of protein structure space is an intrinsic property of proteins.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Adrian K Arakaki; Seung Yup Lee; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences.

Authors:  O Gotoh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A resource for benchmarking the usefulness of protein structure models.

Authors:  Daniel Carbajo; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Protein models docking benchmark 2.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Alexander V Tuzikov; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-03-25

3.  Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-24

4.  Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Michael J E Sternberg; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ivan Anishchenko; Taras Dauzhenka; Ian Kotthoff; Daniil Mnevets; Matthew M Copeland; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Dockground scoring benchmarks for protein docking.

Authors:  Ian Kotthoff; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 7.  Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Jie Liang; Arthur Olson; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Sandor Vajda; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants.

Authors:  Johnathan D Guest; Thom Vreven; Jing Zhou; Iain Moal; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Jeffrey J Gray; Zhiping Weng; Brian G Pierce
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.871

9.  NPPD: A Protein-Protein Docking Scoring Function Based on Dyadic Differences in Networks of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Amino Acid Residues.

Authors:  Edward S C Shih; Ming-Jing Hwang
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-24

10.  Finding correct protein-protein docking models using ProQDock.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.