Literature DB >> 25712716

Protein models docking benchmark 2.

Ivan Anishchenko1, Petras J Kundrotas, Alexander V Tuzikov, Ilya A Vakser.   

Abstract

Structural characterization of protein-protein interactions is essential for our ability to understand life processes. However, only a fraction of known proteins have experimentally determined structures. Such structures provide templates for modeling of a large part of the proteome, where individual proteins can be docked by template-free or template-based techniques. Still, the sensitivity of the docking methods to the inherent inaccuracies of protein models, as opposed to the experimentally determined high-resolution structures, remains largely untested, primarily due to the absence of appropriate benchmark set(s). Structures in such a set should have predefined inaccuracy levels and, at the same time, resemble actual protein models in terms of structural motifs/packing. The set should also be large enough to ensure statistical reliability of the benchmarking results. We present a major update of the previously developed benchmark set of protein models. For each interactor, six models were generated with the model-to-native C(α) RMSD in the 1 to 6 Å range. The models in the set were generated by a new approach, which corresponds to the actual modeling of new protein structures in the "real case scenario," as opposed to the previous set, where a significant number of structures were model-like only. In addition, the larger number of complexes (165 vs. 63 in the previous set) increases the statistical reliability of the benchmarking. We estimated the highest accuracy of the predicted complexes (according to CAPRI criteria), which can be attained using the benchmark structures. The set is available at http://dockground.bioinformatics.ku.edu.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  modeling of protein complexes; protein interactions; protein modeling; protein recognition; structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25712716      PMCID: PMC4400263          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  23 in total

1.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

Review 3.  Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Matthieu Pichaud; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Dominique Douguet; Huei-Chi Chen; Andrey Tovchigrechko; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Nature of the protein universe.

Authors:  Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Dominique Douguet; Andrey Tovchigrechko; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-12-01

Review 7.  A structural explanation for the twilight zone of protein sequence homology.

Authors:  S Y Chung; S Subbiah
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome.

Authors:  Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.

Authors:  Yang Zhang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  13 in total

1.  Gene ontology improves template selection in comparative protein docking.

Authors:  Anna Hadarovich; Ivan Anishchenko; Alexander V Tuzikov; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  Structural quality of unrefined models in protein docking.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-11-13

3.  Modeling complexes of modeled proteins.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-24

4.  Application of docking methodologies to modeled proteins.

Authors:  Amar Singh; Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Michael J E Sternberg; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-20

5.  Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Ivan Anishchenko; Taras Dauzhenka; Ian Kotthoff; Daniil Mnevets; Matthew M Copeland; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  A benchmark testing ground for integrating homology modeling and protein docking.

Authors:  Tanggis Bohnuud; Lingqi Luo; Shoshana J Wodak; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Zhiping Weng; Sandor Vajda; Ora Schueler-Furman; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-11-13

7.  Dockground scoring benchmarks for protein docking.

Authors:  Ian Kotthoff; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-02-05

8.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.

Authors:  Peter J Huwe; Qifang Xu; Maxim V Shapovalov; Vivek Modi; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 10.  Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Jie Liang; Arthur Olson; Huan-Xiang Zhou; Sandor Vajda; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.