Literature DB >> 23929497

Totally laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned and results of a short-term follow-up.

A Moazzez1, R J Mason, A Darehzereshki, N Katkhouda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Totally Laparoscopic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (TLAWR) combines the laparoscopic component separation and the laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, with the purpose of further increasing the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure. However, neither the patient selection criteria nor the long-term results of this technique have been reported. Our objective is to discuss our experience with five patients who received a TLAWR.
METHODS: All patients with a midline incisional hernia who underwent a TLAWR from September 2008 to October 2009 were retrospectively reviewed for early and late postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of five patients underwent the procedure, with a mean age of 48.6 ± 7.9 years. The mean length of stay was 9.2 ± 5.4 days, and follow-up was 12.3 ± 6.8 months. The mean defect size was 175.8 ± 56.2 cm(2). There were no early or late wound complications. Two patients had an early respiratory complication, and one patient developed a port site hernia and small bowel obstruction early after procedure, which required a re-operation. Three patients (60 %) experienced a recurrence. Possible risk factors for recurrence include previous failed hernia repair, loss of domain, large hernias and close proximity to bony structures.
CONCLUSIONS: Although TLAWR is feasible and improves wound complications, it may be associated with higher recurrence. Appropriate patient selection is imperative in order for the patient to benefit from this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23929497     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1145-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  18 in total

1.  Endoscopically assisted "components separation technique" for the repair of complicated ventral hernias.

Authors:  Sylvester M Maas; ReilinghTammo S de Vries; Harry van Goor; Dick de Jong; Robert P Bleichrodt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Karem C Harth; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation.

Authors:  Winnie M Y Tong; William Hope; David W Overby; Charles S Hultman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  A new technique for minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction of complex incisional hernias: totally laparoscopic component separation and incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Ashkan Moazzez; Rodney J Mason; Namir Katkhouda
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2010-10

Review 6.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: advances and limitations.

Authors:  Salvador Morales-Conde
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2004-09

7.  Preliminary experience and development of an algorithm for the optimal use of the laparoscopic component separation technique for myofascial advancement during ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Michael Parker; Jillian M Bray; Jason M Pfluke; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith; Steven P Bowers
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  A case series of laparoscopic components separation and rectus medialization with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kashif Malik; Steven P Bowers; C Daniel Smith; Horacio Asbun; Susanne Preissler
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Christina Williams; Judy Jin; Michael F McGee; Steve Schomisch; Jeffrey Marks; Jeffrey Ponsky
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Technique of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be modified to successfully repair large defects in patients with loss of domain.

Authors:  Mercedeh Baghai; Bruce J Ramshaw; C Daniel Smith; Nicole Fearing; Sharon Bachman; Archana Ramaswamy
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noah J Switzer; Mark A Dykstra; Richdeep S Gill; Stephanie Lim; Erica Lester; Christopher de Gara; Xinzhe Shi; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Isaias Alarcón; Salvador Morales-Conde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Repair of Concomitant Incisional and Parastomal Hernias Using a Hybrid Technique: A Series of 32 Patients.

Authors:  Xinyong Zhu; Wen Tian; Jiye Li; Pengjun Sun; Lijuan Pei; Shijie Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.