Literature DB >> 20226907

Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Karem C Harth1, Michael J Rosen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open component separation has a high wound complication rate. Newer endoscopic approaches are described with no comparative trials.
METHODS: A retrospective review (2005-2009) of patients undergoing open or endoscopic component separation was performed.
RESULTS: Forty-four cases were identified (22 endoscopic; 22 open). All perioperative variables were the same except age (65 open vs 55 endoscopic; P<.05). Hospital length of stay was 11 days in the open group versus 8 days in the endoscopic group (P=.09). Wound complications were 52% in the open group versus 27% in the endoscopic group (P=.09). Wound-related interventions occurred in 45% of the open group and 33% of the endoscopic group. Hernia recurrences rates were similar (open, 32%; endoscopic, 27%; P=.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Open and endoscopic components separation have similar rates of recurrence. The endoscopic group had shorter lengths of stay and less major wound complications. The endoscopic approach may be the ideal technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20226907     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  32 in total

1.  Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison.

Authors:  Karem C Harth; Johnie Rose; Conor P Delaney; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Ihab Halaweish; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Abdominal wall components separation method for closure of complicated abdominal hernias].

Authors:  D Pantelis; A Jafari; T O Vilz; N Schäfer; J C Kalff; M Kaminski
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Thirty-day readmission after ventral hernia repair: predictable or preventable?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Blatnik; Karem C Harth; Mark I Aeder; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed.

Authors:  Samuel G Parker; C P J Wood; J W Butterworth; R W Boulton; A A O Plumb; S Mallett; S Halligan; A C J Windsor
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Planned hernia repair and late abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Ari Leppäniemi; Erkki Tukiainen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.

Authors:  E B Deerenberg; L Timmermans; D P Hogerzeil; J C Slieker; P H C Eilers; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Revisiting the Anterior Rectus Sheath Repair for Incisional Hernia: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Erica I Hodgman; Mark J Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Evaluation of ultrasound for identification of abdominal wall myofascial components by novice learners.

Authors:  Joseph F Sucher; Calvin Lyons; Nilson Salas; Vadim Sherman; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  A Eriksson; J Rosenberg; T Bisgaard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  A single institutional comparison of endoscopic and open abdominal component separation.

Authors:  Saïd C Azoury; Andrew P Dhanasopon; Xuan Hui; Carla De La Cruz; Sami H Tuffaha; Justin M Sacks; Kenzo Hirose; Thomas H Magnuson; Caiyun Liao; Monica Lovins; Michael A Schweitzer; Hien T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.