Literature DB >> 17693287

Laparoscopic versus open-component separation: a comparative analysis in a porcine model.

Michael J Rosen1, Christina Williams, Judy Jin, Michael F McGee, Steve Schomisch, Jeffrey Marks, Jeffrey Ponsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ideal surgical treatment for complicated ventral hernias remains elusive. Traditional component separation provides local advancement of native tissue for tension-free closure without prosthetic materials. This technique requires an extensive subcutaneous dissection with division of perforating vessels predisposing to skin-flap necrosis and complicated wound infections. A minimally invasive component separation may decrease wound complication rates; however, the adequacy of the myofascial advancement has not been studied.
METHODS: Five 25-kg pigs underwent bilateral laparoscopic component separation. A 10-mm incision was made lateral to the rectus abdominus muscle. The external oblique fascia was incised, and a dissecting balloon was inflated between the internal and external oblique muscles. Two additional ports were placed in the intermuscular space. The external oblique was incised from the costal margin to the inguinal ligament. The maximal abdominal wall advancement was recorded. A formal open-component separation was performed and maximal advancement 5 cm superior and 5 cm inferior to the umbilicus was recorded for comparison. Groups were compared using standard statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic component separation was completed successfully in all animals, with a mean of 22 min/side. Laparoscopic component separation yielded 3.9 cm (SD 1.1) of fascial advancement above the umbilicus, whereas 4.4 cm (1.2) was obtained after open release (P = .24). Below the umbilicus, laparoscopic release achieved 5.0 cm (1.0) of advancement, whereas 5.8 cm (1.2) was gained after open release (P = .13). COMMENTS: The minimally invasive component separation achieved an average of 86% of the myofascial advancement compared with a formal open release. The laparoscopic approach does not require extensive subcutaneous dissection and might theoretically result in a decreased incidence or decreased complexity of postoperative wound infections or skin-flap necrosis. Based on our preliminary data in this porcine model, further comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open component separation in complex ventral hernia repair is warranted to evaluate postoperative morbidity and long-term hernia recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17693287     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  23 in total

1.  Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison.

Authors:  Karem C Harth; Johnie Rose; Conor P Delaney; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Ihab Halaweish; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The endoscopic component separation technique for hernia repair results in reduced morbidity compared to the open component separation technique.

Authors:  M Giurgius; L Bendure; D L Davenport; J S Roth
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Systematic review of transversus abdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Wegdam; J M M Thoolen; S W Nienhuijs; N de Bouvy; T S de Vries Reilingh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Repair of abdominal wall hernias with restoration of abdominal wall function.

Authors:  Michael J Rosen; Javairiah Fatima; Michael G Sarr
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with digestive tract fistulas.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Pamela L Tushoski
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-09

6.  Evaluation of anterior versus posterior component separation for hernia repair in a cadaveric model.

Authors:  Arnab Majumder; Luis A Martin-Del-Campo; Heidi J Miller; Dina Podolsky; Hooman Soltanian; Yuri W Novitsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Implementing preoperative Botulinum toxin A and progressive pneumoperitoneum through the use of an algorithm in giant ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Y Yurtkap; M M J van Rooijen; S Roels; J M L Bosmans; O Uyttebroek; J F Lange; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Selective muscle botulinum toxin A component paralysis in complex ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  K E Elstner; J W Read; J Saunders; P H Cosman; O Rodriguez-Acevedo; A S W Jacombs; R T Martins; N Ibrahim
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Endoscopic anterior component separation: a novel technical approach.

Authors:  B Dauser; S Ghaffari; C Ng; T Schmid; G Köhler; F Herbst
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  A single institutional comparison of endoscopic and open abdominal component separation.

Authors:  Saïd C Azoury; Andrew P Dhanasopon; Xuan Hui; Carla De La Cruz; Sami H Tuffaha; Justin M Sacks; Kenzo Hirose; Thomas H Magnuson; Caiyun Liao; Monica Lovins; Michael A Schweitzer; Hien T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.