Literature DB >> 21346524

Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation.

Winnie M Y Tong1, William Hope, David W Overby, Charles S Hultman.   

Abstract

Component separation (CS) has been advocated as the technique of choice to reconstruct complex abdominal hernia defects, especially in the setting of gross contamination. However, open CS was reported to have relatively high incidences of wound complications. Minimally invasive approaches to CS were proposed by several surgeons to reduce wound morbidity. To date, there are limited comparative data between minimally invasive CS (MICS) versus open CS. In this article, we reviewed existing literature on open CS versus MICS with respect to their recurrence and complication rates. Our analysis appeared to show that MICS has comparable recurrence and complication rates relative to open CS although our analysis had several limitations. To demonstrate the management of complications after MICS, we reported our experience of using MICS to repair a recurrent incisional hernia in a 63-year-old man after a perforated ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346524     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3c91

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  11 in total

1.  Validation of a questionnaire for the assessment of pain following ventral hernia repair--the VHPQ.

Authors:  Leonard Clay; Ulf Fränneby; Gabriel Sandblom; Ulf Gunnarsson; Karin Strigård
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Andrea Balla; Isaias Alarcón; Salvador Morales-Conde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  A Eriksson; J Rosenberg; T Bisgaard
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Totally laparoscopic abdominal wall reconstruction: lessons learned and results of a short-term follow-up.

Authors:  A Moazzez; R J Mason; A Darehzereshki; N Katkhouda
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Short- and mid-term outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia.

Authors:  P Baccari; J Nifosi; L Ghirardelli; C Staudacher
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Endoscopic component separation for ventral hernia causes fewer wound complications compared to open components separation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristian K Jensen; Nadia A Henriksen; Lars N Jorgensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Nutritional management of enterocutaneous fistula: a retrospective study at a Malaysian university medical center.

Authors:  Manal Mh Badrasawi; Suzana Shahar; Ismail Sagap
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-08-20

Review 8.  An Evaluation of the Evidence Guiding Adult Midline Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Alex Sagar; Niteen Tapuria
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-02

9.  Outcomes following placement of non-cross-linked porcine-derived acellular dermal matrix in complex ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Dinakar Golla; Carly C Russo
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun

10.  What Do We Know About Component Separation Techniques for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair?

Authors:  Hubert Scheuerlein; Andreas Thiessen; Christine Schug-Pass; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.