Literature DB >> 23927196

Assessment of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of rodent mammary tumors using ultrasound backscatter coefficients.

Jeremy P Kemmerer1, Goutam Ghoshal, Chandra Karunakaran, Michael L Oelze.   

Abstract

Fischer 344 rats with subcutaneous mammary adenocarcinoma tumors were exposed to therapeutic ultrasound at one of three exposure levels (335, 360, and 502 W/cm(2) spatial-peak temporal-average intensity). Quantitative ultrasound estimates were generated from ultrasound radio frequency (RF) data from tumors before and after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Treatment outcome was independently assessed by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining, histological analysis by a pathologist, and thermocouple data. The average backscatter coefficient (BSC) and integrated backscatter coefficient (IBSC) were estimated before and after therapeutic ultrasound exposure for each tumor from RF data collected using clinical (Ultrasonix Sonix RP) and small-animal (Visualsonics Vevo 2100) array systems. Changes in the BSC with treatment were comparable to inter-sample variation of untreated tumors, but statistically significant differences in the change in the IBSCs were observed when comparing the exposures collectively (p < 0.10 for Sonix RP, p < 0.05 for Vevo 2100). Several exposure levels produced statistically significant differences in the change in IBSC when examined pair-wise, including two exposures having similar intensities (p < 0.05, Vevo 2100). A comparison of the IBSC results with temperature data, histology, and TTC staining revealed that the BSC was not always sensitive to thermal insult and that peak exposure pressure appeared to correlate with observed BSC increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927196      PMCID: PMC3745495          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Perspectives in clinical uses of high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  G T Clement
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: initial comparison with MRI.

Authors:  L Curiel; R Souchon; O Rouvière; A Gelet; J Y Chapelon
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Two-dimensional temperature estimation using diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  C Simon; P Vanbaren; E S Ebbini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: a general model.

Authors:  C R Hill; I Rivens; M G Vaughan; G R ter Haar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Tumor irradiation with intense ultrasound.

Authors:  F J Fry; L K Johnson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization and histopathology in tumor xenografts following ultrasonically induced hyperthermia.

Authors:  R H Silverman; D J Coleman; F L Lizzi; J H Torpey; J Driller; T Iwamoto; S E Burgess; A Rosado
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Roberto J Lavarello; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stewart; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Clare M C Tempany; Bradley J Quade; Yael Inbar; Tilman Ehrenstein; Asher Shushan; Jonathan T Hindley; Robert D Goldin; Matthias David; Miri Sklair; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Quantitative ultrasound characterization of responses to radiotherapy in cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Roxana M Vlad; Sebastian Brand; Anoja Giles; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  A clinical review of focused ultrasound ablation with magnetic resonance guidance: an option for treating uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Gina K Hesley; Krzysztof R Gorny; Tara L Henrichsen; David A Woodrum; Douglas L Brown
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.657

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative Ultrasound for Monitoring High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment In Vivo.

Authors:  Goutam Ghoshal; Jeremy P Kemmerer; Chandra Karunakaran; Rita J Miller; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Scattering by single physically large and weak scatterers in the beam of a single-element transducer.

Authors:  Jeremy P Kemmerer; Michael L Oelze; Miklós Gyöngy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Analysis of Two Quantitative Ultrasound Approaches.

Authors:  Pauline Muleki-Seya; Aiguo Han; Michael P Andre; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Quantitative Ultrasound Comparison of MAT and 4T1 Mammary Tumors in Mice and Rats Across Multiple Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Goutam Ghoshal; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kibo Nam; Yeonjoo Park; Alexander D Pawlicki; Rita J Miller; Douglas G Simpson; James A Zagzebski; Michael L Oelze; Timothy J Hall; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.