Literature DB >> 2392363

Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception.

L L Barr1, S D Stansberry, L E Swischuk.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of sixty consecutive cases of proven intussusception with attempt at contrast enema reduction was performed to evaluate currently proposed contraindications to such reduction. When patient age, duration of symptoms, presence of small bowel obstruction and presence of a dissection sign were considered alone, none of the findings indicated irreducibility. Our overall reduction rate was 72% with a complication rate of 3%. This is similar to previously reported series and we concur with more recent publications that the only contraindications to non-surgical reduction of intussusception are free intraperitoneal air, peritonitis or evidence of infarcted bowel. Only when we encountered a combination of symptoms being present for greater than 48 hours and the presence of both small bowel obstruction and a dissection sign was reduction likely to be unsuccessful. However, the presence of a prognostic indicator occurring alone should not be considered a contraindication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2392363     DOI: 10.1007/bf02075207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  13 in total

1.  An experimental study of the effects of barium and intestinal contents on the peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  D Q COCHRAN; C H ALMOND; W A SHUCART
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1963-04

2.  Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6,396 cases in 13 years.

Authors:  J Z Guo; X Y Ma; Q H Zhou
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage. Effects on peritoneum.

Authors:  A Z Ginai
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Treatment of intussusception with small bowel obstruction: application of decision analysis.

Authors:  J C Leonidas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Leading points in childhood intussusception.

Authors:  S H Ein
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Colon perforation during attempted barium enema reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  S H Ein; S Mercer; A Humphry; P Macdonald
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  The dissection sign of nonreducible ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  M C Fishman; S Borden; A Cooper
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Intussusception in infants and children: diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  G S Bisset; D R Kirks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  John Caffey Award. Intussusception reduction in children by rectal insufflation of air.

Authors:  L Gu; D J Alton; A Daneman; D A Stringer; P Liu; D M Wilmot; B J Reilly
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Management of intussusception in infants and children: a survey based on 288 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Gierup; H Jorulf; A Livaditis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  7 in total

1.  Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Rachel O'Connor; Heike Daldrup-Link; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-29

2.  Ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution enema: first-choice procedure for reducing idiopathic intussusception.

Authors:  D Di Renzo; M Colangelo; G Lauriti; F De Girolamo; A Persico; P Lelli Chiesa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Air encircling the intussusceptum on air enema for intussusception reduction: an indication for surgery?

Authors:  B Z Koplewitz; N Simanovsky; P D Lebensart; R Udassin; K Abu-Dalu; D Arbell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Validity of plain films in intussusception.

Authors:  J Alberto Hernandez; Leonard E Swischuk; Carlos A Angel
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-15

Review 5.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

6.  Effectiveness of pneumatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children.

Authors:  F Menor; H Cortina; A Marco; R Olague
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Current radiological management of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Hyun Soo Ko; Jens Peter Schenk; Jochen Tröger; Wiltrud K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.