Literature DB >> 7252734

Colon perforation during attempted barium enema reduction of intussusception.

S H Ein, S Mercer, A Humphry, P Macdonald.   

Abstract

In reviewing the records of almost 1000 infants and children with intussusception in two children's hospitals over the last 25 yr, there have been seven bowel perforations during attempted hydrostatic barium enema reduction of an intussusception. Except for one instance, these have all occurred during the last 6 yr. The infants were all 6 mo old or less and most had a preceeding viral illness. Only 4 of the 7 had pain, all vomited, in only 2 was a mass felt and all but 1 had rectal bleeding. The duration of these signs and symptoms was longer than 36 hr with most ill for 3 or 4 days. All seven infants had abdominal x-rays that showed complete small bowel obstruction. Once the intussusception was suspected, barium enema reduction was attempted without excessive hydrostatic pressure and not for a prolonged time; all the ileocolic intussusceptions were met in the transverse colon with only a minimal reduction produced. It was at this time that a perforation was suddenly noted. All infants required immediate right hemicolectomy for the area (s) of colonic necrosis. Postoperatively, there were two wound infections, a volvulus which left the child with a short gut and another infant suffered severe brain damage. These babies seem to fit a pattern in which they are younger and sicker longer than the average infant with an intussusception, and have a complete small bowel obstruction. These facts may be a warning that such infants are at increased risk for a barium enema bowel perforation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7252734     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(81)80687-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  10 in total

1.  Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception.

Authors:  L L Barr; S D Stansberry; L E Swischuk
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1990

2.  Contrast media in intussusception.

Authors:  J B Campbell
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1989

3.  Intussusception in babies under 4 months of age.

Authors:  J Newman; S Schuh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Exclusion criteria and outcome in pressure reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  D den Hollander; D M Burge
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children--a comparison of perforation with barium and air.

Authors:  A Daneman; D J Alton; S Ein; D Wesson; R Superina; P Thorner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

6.  Intussusception--current trends in management.

Authors:  K W Liu; J MacCarthy; E J Guiney; R J Fitzgerald
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Intussusception: influence of age on reducibility.

Authors:  C Jennings; J Kelleher
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1984

8.  Computed tomography findings of unanticipated prolonged ileocolic intussusception in children.

Authors:  Devin Puapong; Steven L Lee; Gary Radner; Peter I Tsai; Douglas S Katz; Maher A Abbas; Harry Applebaum
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

9.  Etiology and surgical management of pediatric acute colon perforation beyond the neonatal stage.

Authors:  Sarah Siyin Tan; Kai Wang; Wenbo Pang; Dongyang Wu; Chunhui Peng; Zengmeng Wang; Dan Zhang; Yajun Chen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  An air insufflation device for reduction of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Reju J Thomas; Syam Rakhesh
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.