Literature DB >> 25432441

Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results.

Rebecca Stein-Wexler1, Rachel O'Connor, Heike Daldrup-Link, Sandra L Wootton-Gorges.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intussusception is a common pediatric abdominal emergency, treated with image-guided reduction. Available techniques include fluoroscopic and ultrasonographic monitoring of liquid and air.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine current practices and establish trends by comparing our findings with reports of previous surveys.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is based on an e-mail survey sent to all 1,538 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology. It included questions about demographics, presence of parents/surgeon during procedure, patient selection/preparation, use of sedation, preferred methods of reduction and technical details, approach to unsuccessful reduction, and self-reported incidence of success/perforation.
RESULTS: The 456 respondents (30%) reported attempting 3,834 reductions in the preceding 12 months. Of these, 96% use fluoroscopy and 4% use US guidance for reduction; 78% use air, 20% prefer fluid; 75% require intravenous access; 63% expect a surgeon to be present in hospital; 93% do not sedate. Although inflating a rectal balloon is controversial, 39% do so, and 50% employ a pressure-release valve. Seventy-two percent attempt reductions three times in the same position. In case of unsuccessful reductions, 64% wait and re-attempt later, 19% apply manual pressure, and 15% try again in left decubitus position. About 20% reattempt reduction after waiting 2 h or more.
CONCLUSION: By providing a better understanding of both trends in and diversity of current practice, we hope to increase the confidence with which the individual practitioner will approach each case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432441     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3214-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  44 in total

1.  Intestinal intussusception survey about diagnostic and nonsurgical therapeutic procedures.

Authors:  P Schmit; W K Rohrschneider; D Christmann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception: technique and demonstration.

Authors:  P L Khong; W C Peh; C H Lam; K L Chan; W Cheng; W W Lam; V H Ai; H Saing; P K Tam; L L Leong; L C Low
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable?

Authors:  M A Sargent; B P Wilson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

4.  Comparative examination of various rectal tubes and contrast media for the reduction of intussusceptions.

Authors:  T Schmitz-Rode; C Müller-Leisse; G Alzen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Intussusception: even Hippocrates did not standardize his technique of enema reduction.

Authors:  W H McAlister
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Intussusception: trapped peritoneal fluid detected with US--relationship to reducibility and ischemia.

Authors:  G del-Pozo; J González-Spinola; B Gómez-Ansón; C Serrano; M Miralles; G González-deOrbe; I Cano; A Martínez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Variations in the radiological management of intussusception: results of a postal survey.

Authors:  F M Jewell; C Roobottom; A Duncan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Childhood intussusception and approaches to treatment: a historical review.

Authors:  V G McDermott
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

Review 9.  An institutional analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis of pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction for pediatric intussusception.

Authors:  Alana L Beres; Robert Baird
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Current radiological management of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Hyun Soo Ko; Jens Peter Schenk; Jochen Tröger; Wiltrud K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  13 in total

1.  Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pyeong Hwa Kim; Jisun Hwang; Hee Mang Yoon; Jeong-Yong Lee; Ah Young Jung; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative safety and efficacy of balloon use in air enema reduction for pediatric intussusception.

Authors:  Farahnaz Golriz; Christopher I Cassady; Brandy Bales; Christi Herrejon; M John Hicks; Wei Zhang; Robert C Orth; R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-24

3.  Reply to Dr. Vazquez et al. regarding current methods for reducing intussusception: external manual reduction with US assistance.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Rachel O'Connor; Heike Daldrup; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-27

4.  Current methods for reducing intussusception: external manual reduction with US assistance.

Authors:  Jose L Vazquez; Catherine Adamsbaum; Patricia Blanco; Stephanie Franchi-Abella
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 5.  The pediatric gastrointestinal tract: ultrasound findings in acute diseases.

Authors:  Francesco Esposito; Marco Di Serafino; Carmela Mercogliano; Dolores Ferrara; Norberto Vezzali; Giovanni Di Nardo; Luigi Martemucci; Gianfranco Vallone; Massimo Zeccolini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-13

Review 6.  Intussusception: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Edwards; Nicholas Pigg; Jesse Courtier; Matthew A Zapala; John D MacKenzie; Andrew S Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

7.  Intussusception reduction: Effect of air vs. liquid enema on radiation dose.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; Dennise Magill; Marc A Felice; J Christopher Edgar; Sudha A Anupindi; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-06-03

8.  Assessment of a modified technique for air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction.

Authors:  Gaurav Jindal; Brendon L Graeber; Lawrence H Staib; Cicero T Silva
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 9.  Selecting appropriate gastroenteric contrast media for diagnostic fluoroscopic imaging in infants and children: a practical approach.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Jennifer M Talmadge; Robert D MacDougall; Patricia L Kleinman; George A Taylor; Carlo Buonomo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-10-10

Review 10.  Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.