Literature DB >> 23922479

Stepwise sedation for elderly patients with mild/moderate COPD during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Can-Xia Xu1, Xiong Chen, Yan Jia, Ding-Hua Xiao, Hui-Fang Zou, Qin Guo, Fen Wang, Xiao-Yan Wang, Shou-Rong Shen, Ling-Ling Tong, Ke Cao, Xiao-Ming Liu.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate stepwise sedation for elderly patients with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy.
METHODS: Eighty-six elderly patients with mild/moderate COPD and 82 elderly patients without COPD scheduled for upper GI endoscopy were randomly assigned to receive one of the following two sedation methods: stepwise sedation involving three-stage administration of propofol combined with midazolam [COPD with stepwise sedation (group Cs), and non-COPD with stepwise sedation (group Ns)] or continuous sedation involving continuous administration of propofol combined with midazolam [COPD with continuous sedation (group Cc), and non-COPD with continuous sedation (group Nc)]. Saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), blood pressure, and pulse rate were monitored, and patient discomfort, adverse events, drugs dosage, and recovery time were recorded.
RESULTS: All endoscopies were completed successfully. The occurrences of hypoxemia in groups Cs, Cc, Ns, and Nc were 4 (9.3%), 12 (27.9%), 3 (7.3%), and 5 (12.2%), respectively. The occurrence of hypoxemia in group Cs was significantly lower than that in group Cc (P < 0.05). The average decreases in value of SpO2, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure in group Cs were significantly lower than those in group Cc. Additionally, propofol dosage and overall rate of adverse events in group Cs were lower than those in group Cc. Finally, the recovery time in group Cs was significantly shorter than that in group Cc, and that in group Ns was significantly shorter than that in group Nc (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The stepwise sedation method is effective and safer than the continuous sedation method for elderly patients with mild/moderate COPD during upper GI endoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Monitoring; Sedation; Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23922479      PMCID: PMC3732854          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  25 in total

1.  Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B E Levitzky; R Lopez; J A Dumot; J J Vargo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Complications of endoscopy.

Authors:  S M Kavic; M D Basson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.

Authors:  Massimo Agostoni; Lorella Fanti; Marco Gemma; Nicola Pasculli; Luigi Beretta; Pier Alberto Testoni
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry.

Authors:  E Sundman; H Witt; R Sandin; R Kuylenstierna; K Bodén; O Ekberg; L I Eriksson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Dose requirement and complications of diluted and undiluted propofol for deep sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin; Wichit Srikureja; Wiyada Chalayonnavin; Siriporn Kongphlay
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  Safe and effective procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in children.

Authors:  Elke J A H van Beek; Piet L J M Leroy
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.839

7.  Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone.

Authors:  M A Ramsay; T M Savege; B R Simpson; R Goodwin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-06-22

Review 8.  Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.

Authors:  G D Bell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Conscious sedation with propofol in elderly patients: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  L T Heuss; P Schnieper; J Drewe; E Pflimlin; C Beglinger
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Propofol compared with combination propofol or midazolam/fentanyl for endoscopy in a community setting.

Authors:  John E Poulos; Peter T Kalogerinis; Jeffrey N Caudle
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2013-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of etomidate-midazolam for screening colonoscopy in the elderly: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Geeho Min; Jae Min Lee; Seung Han Kim; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hoon Jai Chun; Hong Sik Lee; Chang Duck Kim; Jong-Jae Park; Beom Jae Lee; Seong Ji Choi; Woojung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.