Literature DB >> 11684981

Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry.

E Sundman1, H Witt, R Sandin, R Kuylenstierna, K Bodén, O Ekberg, L I Eriksson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic agents alter pharyngeal function with risk of impaired airway protection and aspiration. This study was performed to evaluate pharyngeal function during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane and to compare the drugs for possible differences in this respect.
METHODS: Forty-five healthy volunteers were randomized to receive propofol, isoflurane, or sevoflurane. During series of liquid contrast bolus swallowing, fluoroscopy and simultaneous solid state videomanometry was used to study the incidence of pharyngeal dysfunction, the initiation of swallowing, and the bolus transit time. Pressure changes were recorded at the back of the tongue, the pharyngeal constrictor muscles, and the upper esophageal sphincter. After control recordings, the anesthetic was delivered, and measurements were made at 0.50 and 0.25 predicted blood propotol concentration (Cp50(asleep)) for propofol and 0.50 and 0.25 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)(awake) for the inhalational agents. Final recordings were made 20 min after the end of anesthetic delivery.
RESULTS: All anesthetics caused an increased incidence of pharyngeal dysfunction with laryngeal bolus penetration. Propofol increased the incidence from 8 to 58%, isoflurane from 4 to 36%, and sevoflurane from 6 to 35%. Propofol in 0.50 and 0.25 Cp50(asleep) had the most extensive effect on the pharyngeal contraction patterns (P < 0.05). The upper esophageal sphincter resting tone was markedly reduced from 83 +/- 36 to 39 +/- 19 mmHg by propofol (P < 0.001), which differed from isoflurane (P = 0.03). Sevoflurane also reduced the upper esophageal sphincter resting tone from 65 +/- 16 to 45 +/- 18 mmHg at 0.50 MAC(awake)(P = 0.008). All agents caused a reduced upper esophageal sphincter peak contraction amplitude (P < 0.05), and the reduction was greatest in the propofol group (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane cause an increased incidence of pharyngeal dysfunction with penetration of bolus to the larynx. The effect on the pharyngeal contraction pattern was most pronounced in the propofol group, with markedly reduced contraction forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684981     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  15 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring during difficult airway management.

Authors:  Takashi Asai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Analgesia and sedation for painful interventions in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Christoph Neuhäuser; Bendicht Wagner; Matthias Heckmann; Markus A Weigand; Klaus-Peter Zimmer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Anesthesia and increased hypercarbic drive impair the coordination between breathing and swallowing.

Authors:  Olivia M D'Angelo; Daniel Diaz-Gil; Danuza Nunn; Jeroen C P Simons; Chloe Gianatasio; Noomi Mueller; Matthew J Meyer; Eric Pierce; Carl Rosow; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Stepwise sedation for elderly patients with mild/moderate COPD during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Can-Xia Xu; Xiong Chen; Yan Jia; Ding-Hua Xiao; Hui-Fang Zou; Qin Guo; Fen Wang; Xiao-Yan Wang; Shou-Rong Shen; Ling-Ling Tong; Ke Cao; Xiao-Ming Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Sevoflurane/propofol coadministration provides better recovery than sevoflurane in combined general/epidural anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Ming Ding; Fang Du; Jing Cang; Zhanggang Xue
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Differential effects of isoflurane and propofol on upper airway dilator muscle activity and breathing.

Authors:  Matthias Eikermann; Atul Malhotra; Philipp Fassbender; Sebastian Zaremba; Amy S Jordan; Shiva Gautam; David P White; Nancy L Chamberlin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Target-controlled infusion of propofol for sedation in patients with non-invasive ventilation failure due to low tolerance: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Benjamin Clouzeau; Hoang-Nam Bui; Frederic Vargas; Marieke Grenouillet-Delacre; Emmanuelle Guilhon; Didier Gruson; Gilles Hilbert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Effect of a small dose of propofol or ketamine to prevent coughing and laryngospasm in children awakening from general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hae Jin Pak; Won Hyung Lee; Sung Mi Ji; Youn Hee Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-01-28

9.  Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol.

Authors:  Eric A Harris; David A Lubarsky; Keith A Candiotti
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Addition of sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine reduces gag reflex during propofol based sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomised double-blind study.

Authors:  Manish Tandon; Vijay Kant Pandey; Gaurav Kumar Dubey; Chandra Kant Pandey; Nitya Wadhwa
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.