Literature DB >> 11438266

Complications of endoscopy.

S M Kavic1, M D Basson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although most gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are performed by gastroenterologists, surgeons often assist in the management of patients with complications. This review provides an introduction to the incidence, prevention, and treatment of complications that may occur after upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
METHODS: Systematic review of the literature.
RESULTS: Preprocedural complications include medication effects and adverse effects of bowel preparation. Major procedural complications consist primarily of perforation and hemorrhage. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement may be complicated by fistula and obstruction. There is also a risk of infectious disease transmission, both to and from the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy, like all invasive procedures, carries significant potential risks for the patient. In practiced hands, and with awareness of the problems that may arise, many complications may be avoided and others successfully managed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11438266     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00589-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  40 in total

Review 1.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Mannudeep Kalra; Dushyant Sahani; Aamir Ahmad; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-04

2.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Management of esophageal perforations.

Authors:  Sven Christian Schmidt; Stefan Strauch; Thomas Rösch; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Sven Jonas; Johann Pratschke; Henning Weidemann; Peter Neuhaus; Guido Schumacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Feasible economic strategies to improve screening compliance for colorectal cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Min Park; Young Ho Yun; Soonman Kwon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; Braden J Manns; Robert J Hilsden; Andrew Fong; Stafford Dean; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations: 8 years' experience.

Authors:  Hagit Tulchinsky; Osnat Madhala-Givon; Nir Wasserberg; Shlomo Lelcuk; Yaron Niv
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: A case report and systematic review.

Authors:  Darcy Shaw; Gabriel Gallardo; Marc D Basson
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-27

Review 9.  Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Acute pancreatitis and cholangitis: a complication caused by a migrated gastrostomy tube.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Toshihiro Konagaya; Takashi Hashimoto; Kunio Kasugai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.