Literature DB >> 23919923

Chromatin structure in double strand break repair.

Anastas Gospodinov1, Zdenko Herceg.   

Abstract

Cells are under constant assault by endogenous and environmental DNA damaging agents. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) sever entire chromosomes and pose a major threat to genome integrity as a result of chromosomal fragment loss or chromosomal rearrangements. Exogenous factors such as ionizing radiation, crosslinking agents, and topoisomerase poisons, contribute to break formation. DSBs are associated with oxidative metabolism, form during the normal S phase, when replication forks collapse and are generated during physiological processes such as V(D)J recombination, yeast mating type switching and meiosis. It is estimated that in mammalian cells ∼10 DSBs per cell are formed daily. If left unrepaired DSBs can lead to cell death or deregulated growth, and cancer development. Cellular response to DSB damage includes mechanisms to halt the progression of the cell cycle and to restore the structure of the broken chromosome. Changes in chromatin adjacent to DNA break sites are instrumental to the DNA damage response (DDR) with two apparent ends: to control compaction and to bind repair and signaling molecules to the lesion. Here, we review the key findings related to each of these functions and examine their cross-talk.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chromatin; DNA repair; DSBs; Histone modifications

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23919923     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  25 in total

1.  Acetylation of Histone H2AX at Lys 5 by the TIP60 Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Is Essential for the Dynamic Binding of NBS1 to Damaged Chromatin.

Authors:  Masae Ikura; Kanji Furuya; Shun Matsuda; Ryo Matsuda; Hiroki Shima; Jun Adachi; Tomonari Matsuda; Takuma Shiraki; Tsuyoshi Ikura
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  RecBCD is required to complete chromosomal replication: Implications for double-strand break frequencies and repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Justin Courcelle; Brian M Wendel; Dena D Livingstone; Charmain T Courcelle
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-05-02

Review 3.  DNA Damage Repair in the Context of Plant Chromatin.

Authors:  Mattia Donà; Ortrun Mittelsten Scheid
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-09-09

5.  Interstitial telomeric repeats-associated DNA breaks.

Authors:  Olga Shubernetskaya; Dmitry Skvortsov; Sergey Evfratov; Maria Rubtsova; Elena Belova; Olga Strelkova; Varvara Cherepaninets; Oxana Zhironkina; Alexey Olovnikov; Maria Zvereva; Olga Dontsova; Igor Kireev
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.197

6.  Fragile sites of 45S rDNA of Lolium multiflorum are not hotspots for chromosomal breakages induced by X-ray.

Authors:  Laiane Corsini Rocha; Andrea Mittelmann; Andreas Houben; Vânia Helena Techio
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Inhibition of H3K4me2 Demethylation Protects Auditory Hair Cells from Neomycin-Induced Apoptosis.

Authors:  Yingzi He; Huiqian Yu; Chengfu Cai; Shan Sun; Renjie Chai; Huawei Li
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 8.  An insight into understanding the coupling between homologous recombination mediated DNA repair and chromatin remodeling mechanisms in plant genome: an update.

Authors:  Samrat Banerjee; Sujit Roy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 5.173

9.  Maintenance of Genome Integrity by Mi2 Homologs CHD-3 and LET-418 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Carolyn A Turcotte; Solomon A Sloat; Julia A Rigothi; Erika Rosenkranse; Alexandra L Northrup; Nicolas P Andrews; Paula M Checchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Massive interstitial copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity as evidence for cancer being a disease of the DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Yogesh Kumar; Jianfeng Yang; Taobo Hu; Lei Chen; Zhi Xu; Lin Xu; Xiao-Xia Hu; Gusheng Tang; Jian-Min Wang; Yi Li; Wai-Sang Poon; Weiqing Wan; Liwei Zhang; Wai-Kin Mat; Frank W Pun; Peggy Lee; Timothy H Y Cheong; Xiaofan Ding; Siu-Kin Ng; Shui-Ying Tsang; Jin-Fei Chen; Peng Zhang; Shao Li; Hong-Yang Wang; Hong Xue
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.