Literature DB >> 28914588

Interstitial telomeric repeats-associated DNA breaks.

Olga Shubernetskaya1, Dmitry Skvortsov1, Sergey Evfratov1, Maria Rubtsova1, Elena Belova1, Olga Strelkova2, Varvara Cherepaninets2, Oxana Zhironkina2, Alexey Olovnikov3, Maria Zvereva1,2, Olga Dontsova1,2,4, Igor Kireev2.   

Abstract

During a cell's lifespan, DNA break formation is a common event, associated with many processes, from replication to apoptosis. Most of DNA breaks are readily repaired, but some are meant to persist in time, such as the chromosome ends, protected by telomeres. Besides them, eukaryotic genomes comprise shorter stretches of interstitial telomeric repeats. We assumed that the latter may also be associated with the formation of DNA breaks meant to persist in time. In zebrafish and mouse embryos, cells containing numerous breakage foci were identified. These breaks were not associated with apoptosis or replication, nor did they seem to activate DNA damage response machinery. Unlike short-living, accidental sparse breaks, the ones we found seem to be closely associated, forming discrete break foci. A PCR-based method was developed, allowing specific amplification of DNA regions located between inverted telomeric repeats associated with breaks. The cloning and sequencing of such DNA fragments were found to denote some specificity in their distribution for different tissue types and development stages.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromatin; DNA breaks; ETUNEL; development; interstitial telomeric repeats; mouse; zebrafish

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914588      PMCID: PMC5788545          DOI: 10.1080/19491034.2017.1356501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleus        ISSN: 1949-1034            Impact factor:   4.197


  51 in total

1.  The redusome hypothesis of aging and the control of biological time during individual development.

Authors:  A M Olovnikov
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Differences in repair profiles of interstitial telomeric sites between normal and DNA double-strand break repair deficient Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  María Teresa Rivero; Alejandro Mosquera; Vicente Goyanes; Predrag Slijepcevic; José Luis Fernández
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Differentiation-related response to DNA breaks in human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Lisa Oliver; Erika Hue; Quentin Séry; Audrey Lafargue; Claire Pecqueur; François Paris; François M Vallette
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Hypersensitivity to DNA damage leads to increased apoptosis during early mouse development.

Authors:  B S Heyer; A MacAuley; O Behrendtsen; Z Werb
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Functional relevance of the histone gammaH2Ax in the response to DNA damaging agents.

Authors:  Ingrid Revet; Luzviminda Feeney; Stephanie Bruguera; Wade Wilson; Tiffany K Dong; Dennis H Oh; David Dankort; James E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Telomeric repeat mutagenicity in human somatic cells is modulated by repeat orientation and G-quadruplex stability.

Authors:  Rama Rao Damerla; Kelly E Knickelbein; Devin Kepchia; Abbe Jackson; Bruce A Armitage; Kristin A Eckert; Patricia L Opresko
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-08-25

Review 7.  Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Brendan D Price; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Macroautophagy-aided elimination of chromatin: sorting of waste, sorting of fate?

Authors:  Jekaterina Erenpreisa; Anda Huna; Kristine Salmina; Thomas R Jackson; Mark S Cragg
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 9.  Transcription and DNA damage: a link to a kink.

Authors:  D A Scicchitano; I Mellon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Global reorganization of the nuclear landscape in senescent cells.

Authors:  Tamir Chandra; Philip Andrew Ewels; Stefan Schoenfelder; Mayra Furlan-Magaril; Steven William Wingett; Kristina Kirschner; Jean-Yves Thuret; Simon Andrews; Peter Fraser; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.