Literature DB >> 26391293

Chromatin perturbations during the DNA damage response in higher eukaryotes.

Christopher J Bakkenist1, Michael B Kastan2.   

Abstract

The DNA damage response is a widely used term that encompasses all signaling initiated at DNA lesions and damaged replication forks as it extends to orchestrate DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, cell death and senescence. ATM, an apical DNA damage signaling kinase, is virtually instantaneously activated following the introduction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex, which has a catalytic role in DNA repair, and the KAT5 (Tip60) acetyltransferase are required for maximal ATM kinase activation in cells exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation. The sensing of DNA lesions occurs within a highly complex and heterogeneous chromatin environment. Chromatin decondensation and histone eviction at DSBs may be permissive for KAT5 binding to H3K9me3 and H3K36me3, ATM kinase acetylation and activation. Furthermore, chromatin perturbation may be a prerequisite for most DNA repair. Nucleosome disassembly during DNA repair was first reported in the 1970s by Smerdon and colleagues when nucleosome rearrangement was noted during the process of nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage in human cells. Recently, the multi-functional protein nucleolin was identified as the relevant histone chaperone required for partial nucleosome disruption at DBSs, the recruitment of repair enzymes and for DNA repair. Notably, ATM kinase is activated by chromatin perturbations induced by a variety of treatments that do not directly cause DSBs, including treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Central to the mechanisms that activate ATR, the second apical DNA damage signaling kinase, outside of a stalled and collapsed replication fork in S-phase, is chromatin decondensation and histone eviction associated with DNA end resection at DSBs. Thus, a stress that is common to both ATM and ATR kinase activation is chromatin perturbations, and we argue that chromatin perturbations are both sufficient and required for induction of the DNA damage response.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; ATR; Chromatin perturbations; Double-strand breaks (DSBs); Ionizing radiation (IR); Nucleolin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26391293      PMCID: PMC4727245          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  80 in total

Review 1.  Micrococcal nuclease: its specificity and use for chromatin analysis.

Authors:  D J Telford; B W Stewart
Journal:  Int J Biochem       Date:  1989

2.  Nucleosome rearrangement in human chromatin during UV-induced DNA- reapir synthesis.

Authors:  M J Smerdon; M W Lieberman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression.

Authors:  W S el-Deiry; T Tokino; V E Velculescu; D B Levy; R Parsons; J M Trent; D Lin; W E Mercer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Radiosensitivity in ataxia-telangiectasia: a new explanation.

Authors:  R B Painter; B R Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Distribution of repair-incorporated nucleotides and nucleosome rearrangement in the chromatin of normal and xeroderma pigmentosum human fibroblasts.

Authors:  M J Smerdon; M B Kastan; M W Lieberman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-08-21       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  DNA repair in a small yeast plasmid folded into chromatin.

Authors:  M J Smerdon; J Bedoyan; F Thoma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Site-specific DNA repair at the nucleosome level in a yeast minichromosome.

Authors:  M J Smerdon; F Thoma
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-05-18       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  A mammalian cell cycle checkpoint pathway utilizing p53 and GADD45 is defective in ataxia-telangiectasia.

Authors:  M B Kastan; Q Zhan; W S el-Deiry; F Carrier; T Jacks; W V Walsh; B S Plunkett; B Vogelstein; A J Fornace
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-11-13       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Weinert; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.

Authors:  J W Harper; G R Adami; N Wei; K Keyomarsi; S J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  27 in total

1.  Adenovirus Core Protein VII Downregulates the DNA Damage Response on the Host Genome.

Authors:  Daphne C Avgousti; Ashley N Della Fera; Clayton J Otter; Christin Herrmann; Neha J Pancholi; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  ATM-dependent pathways of chromatin remodelling and oxidative DNA damage responses.

Authors:  N Daniel Berger; Fintan K T Stanley; Shaun Moore; Aaron A Goodarzi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Modulation of the DNA damage response during the life cycle of human papillomaviruses.

Authors:  Daniel C Anacker; Cary A Moody
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 4.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Maintenance of Genome Integrity by Mi2 Homologs CHD-3 and LET-418 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Carolyn A Turcotte; Solomon A Sloat; Julia A Rigothi; Erika Rosenkranse; Alexandra L Northrup; Nicolas P Andrews; Paula M Checchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Nucleosomes Regulate Base Excision Repair in Chromatin.

Authors:  Rithy Meas; John J Wyrick; Michael J Smerdon
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 7.  From Development to Aging: The Path to Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Alessandra Sacco; Laura Belloni; Lucia Latella
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Bidirectional coupling of splicing and ATM signaling in response to transcription-blocking DNA damage.

Authors:  Maria Tresini; Jurgen A Marteijn; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Schizosaccharomyces pombe KAT5 contributes to resection and repair of a DNA double-strand break.

Authors:  Tingting Li; Ruben C Petreaca; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Regulation of DNA duplication by the mTOR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Zhengfu He; Peter J Houghton; Terence M Williams; Changxian Shen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.