OBJECTIVE: Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) have the potential to restore movement to people with paralysis. However, a clinically-viable BMI must enable consistently accurate control over time spans ranging from years to decades, which has not yet been demonstrated. Most BMIs that use single-unit spikes as inputs will experience degraded performance over time without frequent decoder re-training. Two other signals, local field potentials (LFPs) and multi-unit spikes (MSPs), may offer greater reliability over long periods and better performance stability than single-unit spikes. Here, we demonstrate that LFPs can be used in a biomimetic BMI to control a computer cursor. APPROACH: We implanted two rhesus macaques with intracortical microelectrodes in primary motor cortex. We recorded LFP and MSP signals from the monkeys while they performed a continuous reaching task, moving a cursor to randomly-placed targets on a computer screen. We then used the LFP and MSP signals to construct biomimetic decoders for control of the cursor. MAIN RESULTS: Both monkeys achieved high-performance, continuous control that remained stable or improved over nearly 12 months using an LFP decoder that was not retrained or adapted. In parallel, the monkeys used MSPs to control a BMI without retraining or adaptation and had similar or better performance, and that predominantly remained stable over more than six months. In contrast to their stable online control, both LFP and MSP signals showed substantial variability when used offline to predict hand movements. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that the monkeys were able to stabilize the relationship between neural activity and cursor movement during online BMI control, despite variability in the relationship between neural activity and hand movements.
OBJECTIVE: Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) have the potential to restore movement to people with paralysis. However, a clinically-viable BMI must enable consistently accurate control over time spans ranging from years to decades, which has not yet been demonstrated. Most BMIs that use single-unit spikes as inputs will experience degraded performance over time without frequent decoder re-training. Two other signals, local field potentials (LFPs) and multi-unit spikes (MSPs), may offer greater reliability over long periods and better performance stability than single-unit spikes. Here, we demonstrate that LFPs can be used in a biomimetic BMI to control a computer cursor. APPROACH: We implanted two rhesus macaques with intracortical microelectrodes in primary motor cortex. We recorded LFP and MSP signals from the monkeys while they performed a continuous reaching task, moving a cursor to randomly-placed targets on a computer screen. We then used the LFP and MSP signals to construct biomimetic decoders for control of the cursor. MAIN RESULTS: Both monkeys achieved high-performance, continuous control that remained stable or improved over nearly 12 months using an LFP decoder that was not retrained or adapted. In parallel, the monkeys used MSPs to control a BMI without retraining or adaptation and had similar or better performance, and that predominantly remained stable over more than six months. In contrast to their stable online control, both LFP and MSP signals showed substantial variability when used offline to predict hand movements. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that the monkeys were able to stabilize the relationship between neural activity and cursor movement during online BMI control, despite variability in the relationship between neural activity and hand movements.
Authors: Amy L Orsborn; Siddharth Dangi; Helene G Moorman; Jose M Carmena Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Kai J Miller; Gerwin Schalk; Eberhard E Fetz; Marcel den Nijs; Jeffrey G Ojemann; Rajesh P N Rao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ian H Stevenson; Anil Cherian; Brian M London; Nicholas A Sachs; Eric Lindberg; Jacob Reimer; Marc W Slutzky; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Lee E Miller; Konrad P Kording Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Philip R Kennedy; M Todd Kirby; Melody M Moore; Brandon King; Adon Mallory Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Leigh R Hochberg; Daniel Bacher; Beata Jarosiewicz; Nicolas Y Masse; John D Simeral; Joern Vogel; Sami Haddadin; Jie Liu; Sydney S Cash; Patrick van der Smagt; John P Donoghue Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Samuel R Nason; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Elissa J Welle; Hyochan An; Philip P Vu; Autumn J Bullard; Chrono S Nu; Jonathan C Kao; Krishna V Shenoy; Taekwang Jang; Hun-Seok Kim; David Blaauw; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Alan D Degenhart; James Eles; Richard Dum; Jessica L Mischel; Ivan Smalianchuk; Bridget Endler; Robin C Ashmore; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Wei Wang; Aaron P Batista; X Tracy Cui Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Sergey D Stavisky; Jonathan C Kao; Paul Nuyujukian; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Sagi Perel; Patrick T Sadtler; Emily R Oby; Stephen I Ryu; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Aaron P Batista; Steven M Chase Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Chethan Pandarinath; Paul Nuyujukian; Christine H Blabe; Brittany L Sorice; Jad Saab; Francis R Willett; Leigh R Hochberg; Krishna V Shenoy; Jaimie M Henderson Journal: Elife Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Chethan Pandarinath; K Cora Ames; Abigail A Russo; Ali Farshchian; Lee E Miller; Eva L Dyer; Jonathan C Kao Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Aaron Batista; Anne-Marie A-M Brouwer; Clemens Brunner; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Melanie Fried-Oken; Aysegul Gunduz; Disha Gupta; Andrea Kübler; Robert Leeb; Fabien Lotte; Lee E Miller; Gernot Müller-Putz; Tomasz Rutkowski; Michael Tangermann; David Edward Thompson Journal: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon) Date: 2014-01