BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are surgical treatment options for unicompartmental knee arthritis; these procedures are indicated for patients who do not have severe arthritis in the lateral compartment. Valgus stress radiographs sometimes are used to make this evaluation, but this test has not been critically evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine (1) whether valgus stress radiographs help to evaluate the integrity of the cartilage in the lateral compartment in patients undergoing TKA for noninflammatory arthritis, and (2) whether valgus stress radiographs can identify patients whose varus deformity is correctable. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative hip-to-ankle standing radiographs, AP standing radiographs, and valgus stress radiographs of 84 patients (91 knees) who underwent TKA for varus knee arthritis between July 2010 and January 2012. Valgus stress radiographs were obtained with the patient supine with the knee 20° flexed and a firm manual valgus force was applied through the knee. On valgus stress radiographs, the lateral compartment joint space width and the corrected mechanical alignment were measured. Intraoperative cartilage assessment (Outerbridge grade) was compared with lateral compartment joint space width. Knees with mechanical leg alignment of 3° varus to 3° valgus on valgus stress radiographs were considered correctable deformities. RESULTS: The lateral compartment joint space width on valgus stress radiographs did not correlate with the intraoperative Outerbridge grading of the lateral compartment cartilage (rs = -0.154; p = 0.146). The majority of knees (93%; 55 of 59) with 10° or less mechanical varus on hip-to-ankle standing radiographs were correctable within the range of 3° varus to 3° valgus. CONCLUSIONS: Valgus stress radiographs provided no added benefit to the radiographic assessment of the lateral compartment cartilage and regarding the correctability of the varus deformity.
BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are surgical treatment options for unicompartmental knee arthritis; these procedures are indicated for patients who do not have severe arthritis in the lateral compartment. Valgus stress radiographs sometimes are used to make this evaluation, but this test has not been critically evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine (1) whether valgus stress radiographs help to evaluate the integrity of the cartilage in the lateral compartment in patients undergoing TKA for noninflammatory arthritis, and (2) whether valgus stress radiographs can identify patients whose varus deformity is correctable. METHODS: We reviewed preoperative hip-to-ankle standing radiographs, AP standing radiographs, and valgus stress radiographs of 84 patients (91 knees) who underwent TKA for varus knee arthritis between July 2010 and January 2012. Valgus stress radiographs were obtained with the patient supine with the knee 20° flexed and a firm manual valgus force was applied through the knee. On valgus stress radiographs, the lateral compartment joint space width and the corrected mechanical alignment were measured. Intraoperative cartilage assessment (Outerbridge grade) was compared with lateral compartment joint space width. Knees with mechanical leg alignment of 3° varus to 3° valgus on valgus stress radiographs were considered correctable deformities. RESULTS: The lateral compartment joint space width on valgus stress radiographs did not correlate with the intraoperative Outerbridge grading of the lateral compartment cartilage (rs = -0.154; p = 0.146). The majority of knees (93%; 55 of 59) with 10° or less mechanical varus on hip-to-ankle standing radiographs were correctable within the range of 3° varus to 3° valgus. CONCLUSIONS: Valgus stress radiographs provided no added benefit to the radiographic assessment of the lateral compartment cartilage and regarding the correctability of the varus deformity.
Authors: Wenzel Waldstein; Maximilian F Kasparek; Martin Faschingbauer; Reinhard Windhager; Friedrich Boettner Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jacob F Mortensen; Andreas Kappel; Lasse E Rasmussen; Svend E Østgaard; Anders Odgaard Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 2.928
Authors: Wenzel Waldstein; Giorgio Perino; Shari T Jawetz; Susannah L Gilbert; Friedrich Boettner Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: U Kuwashima; K Okazaki; Y Tashiro; H Mizu-Uchi; S Hamai; S Okamoto; K Murakami; Y Iwamoto Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.853