Literature DB >> 15466754

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger.

John J Swienckowski1, Donald W Pennington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has been used to treat elderly, low-demand patients, but the literature is sparse regarding the use of this procedure for younger, active patients. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in younger, more active patients.
METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent forty-six consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties with use of the Miller-Galante system between 1988 and 1996. All of the patients were sixty years of age or younger and all were physically active. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and the University of California at Los Angeles activity assessment were used to rate the function and to determine the activity level of each patient, respectively. Serial radiographs were used to evaluate the status of prosthetic fixation, femorotibial alignment, and the progression of arthrosis in the unreplaced compartment. Long-term survivorship was calculated with use of Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was eleven years. Of the forty-five knees that were available for follow-up, three had been revised. The Hospital for Special Surgery score was excellent for thirty-nine (93%) of the remaining forty-two knees and good for three. The University of California at Los Angeles activity assessment score was 6.6 +/- 1.4 for the knees in which the original prosthesis had been retained and 7.3 +/- 1.5 for those in which it had been revised. Two asymptomatic patients had revision of a modular tibial component because of substantial radiographic evidence of polyethylene wear; one of these patients had exchange of the polyethylene insert and the tibial tray, and the other had exchange of the polyethylene insert only. A third patient underwent revision total knee arthroplasty because of continuing knee pain and a progressive tibial radiolucent line that was >2 mm in width. The average postoperative femorotibial alignment was 5 degrees of valgus. Nine knees had progression of arthritis in the unresurfaced compartment; none of these knees were revised, and none of the patients had deterioration in the Hospital for Special Surgery score. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated an eleven-year survivorship of 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: At an average duration of follow-up of eleven years, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was associated with pain relief and excellent function in a cohort of patients who had been sixty years of age or younger and active at the time of surgery. Copyright 2004 Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15466754     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200409001-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Kinematics of monoblock bicompartmental knee arthroplasty during weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Brian H Park; Jorg Leffler; Alois Franz; Nicholas J Dunbar; Scott A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched paired study.

Authors:  A Manzotti; N Confalonieri; C Pullen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Current fit of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wolfgang Fitz; Robin Bliss; Elena Losina
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks.

Authors:  M L Dao Trong; C Diezi; G Goerres; N Helmy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The value of valgus stress radiographs in the workup for medial unicompartmental arthritis.

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Jad Bou Monsef; Johannes Buckup; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bernardino Saccomanni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Does intraarticular inflammation predict biomechanical cartilage properties?

Authors:  Wenzel Waldstein; Giorgio Perino; Shari T Jawetz; Susannah L Gilbert; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management.

Authors:  Stefano Zanasi
Journal:  Eur Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-07-13

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xuedong Sun; Zheng Su
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction: unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), UKA + PFA, bi-unicompartmental (Bi-UKA) arthroplasties.

Authors:  N Confalonieri; A Manzotti; F Montironi; C Pullen
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.