Literature DB >> 25155051

The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability.

Yasutaka Tashiro1, Shuichi Matsuda, Ken Okazaki, Hideki Mizu-Uchi, Umito Kuwashima, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to clarify whether the coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is predictable using preoperative full-length valgus stress radiography.
METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 71.5 ± 7.0 years awaiting medial UKA were recruited. Full-length weight-bearing radiographs of the lower limbs were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Preoperative full-length valgus stress radiography in the supine position was also performed, and the transition of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) and the weight-bearing ratio were assessed. The tibia first cut technique was used, and the distal femur was cut parallel to the cutting surface of the proximal tibia during surgery.
RESULTS: The mean postoperative HKAA was 2.0° ± 2.1° varus, and the mean weight-bearing ratio was 43.1 ± 7.7 %; each of these parameters demonstrated significantly strong correlations with the values on the preoperative valgus stress radiographs (p < 0.01), while the correlation between the postoperative alignment and the preoperative standing alignment without stress was moderate (p < 0.01). The postoperative alignment was slightly undercorrected compared to that observed on the valgus stress radiographs (p < 0.05), and no knees exhibited evident overcorrection compared to that on the valgus stress radiographs.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative valgus stress radiography is useful for evaluating the correctability of varus deformities and predicting the postoperative coronal alignment. For clinical relevance, performing preoperative valgus stress radiography would help to more precisely select patients and, when combined with the tibia first cut technique, aid in achieving the expected knee alignment and avoid severe undercorrection or overcorrection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25155051     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3248-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  38 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty--the influence of tibial component inclination.

Authors:  T Sawatari; H Tsumura; K Iesaka; Y Furushiro; T Torisu
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement--a possible cause of pain.

Authors:  D J Simpson; A J Price; A Gulati; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Proximal tibial strain in medial unicompartmental knee replacements: A biomechanical study of implant design.

Authors:  C E H Scott; M J Eaton; R W Nutton; F A Wade; P Pankaj; S L Evans
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Authors:  R A Berger; D D Nedeff; R M Barden; M M Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; A G Rosenberg; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment in the weight-bearing standing position in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Akihiro Ariumi; Takashi Sato; Koichi Kobayashi; Yoshio Koga; Go Omori; Izumi Minato; Naoto Endo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Amir A Jamali; Richard D Scott; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2009-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Individual valgus correction angle improves accuracy of postoperative limb alignment restoration after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Hai Li; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Jing Yang; Pengde Kang; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A modified technique to reduce tibial keel cutting errors during an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hiroshi Inui; Shuji Taketomi; Keitarou Tahara; Ryota Yamagami; Takaki Sanada; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Medial joint line elevation of the tibia measured during surgery has a significant correlation with the limb alignment changes following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuichi Kuroda; Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Masanori Tsubosaka; Takehiko Matsushita; Takahiro Niikura; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Preoperative uncorrectable tibiofemoral subluxation can worsen clinical outcomes after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kamenaga; Naoki Nakano; Kazunari Ishida; Masanori Tsubosaka; Yuichi Kuroda; Shinya Hayashi; Takehiko Matsushita; Takahiro Niikura; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Risk factors of post-operative malalignment in fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Ho Won Kang; Tae Yeong Yang; Jang Yun Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Valgus Correctability and Meniscal Extrusion Were Associated With Alignment After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyota Ishibashi; Eiji Sasaki; Hironori Otsuka; Koyama Kazushige; Yuji Yamamoto; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Agreement and accuracy of radiographic assessment using a decision aid for medial Oxford partial knee replacement: multicentre study.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Ryosuke Furuhashi; Kenichiro Takashiba; Takao Kodama; Kazuhiko Michishita; Hiroshi Inui; Eita Togashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  U Kuwashima; K Okazaki; Y Tashiro; H Mizu-Uchi; S Hamai; S Okamoto; K Murakami; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Effects of Lower Limb Alignment and Tibial Component Inclination on the Biomechanics of Lateral Compartment in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Wen; Wan-Shou Guo; Fu-Qiang Gao; Qi-Dong Zhang; Ju-An Yue; Li-Ming Cheng; Guang-Duo Zhu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.