Literature DB >> 641081

Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty.

R S Laskin.   

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis were treated by replacement arthroplasty using the Marmor modular prosthesis and each patient was followed for at least two years. Despite rigid preoperative criteria for the selection of cases, the over-all results were definitely inferior to those seen after either bicompartmental or tricompartmental replacement arthroplasty. Complications included recurrent pain and degeneration of the other compartment, often associated with abrasion of the remaining cartilaginous surfaces caused by polyethylene particles. There was also more settling of the tibial component in these patients than in patients treated by bicompartmental replacement arthroplasty. Because of these findings, we no longer use unicompartmental replacement of the medial side of the knee. The results after the three lateral compartment replacements, on the other hand, were good, and use of this procedure for post-traumatic arthritis is still under investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 641081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

1.  Fracture of the femoral component of a Brigham unicompartmental knee: a case report.

Authors:  Konstantinos Panousis; Claire Murnaghan; Petra Koettig; Peter Grigoris
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

6.  The tibia first technique with tensor measurement is useful to predict the soft tissue tension after implantation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Koji Takayama; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Daisuke Araki; Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Unicompartmental knee replacement: a historical overview.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Ibrahim Akkawi; Michele Gagliardi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2013-10-24

8.  Up to twelve year follow-up of the Oxford phase three unicompartmental knee replacement in China: seven hundred and eight knees from an independent centre.

Authors:  Huaming Xue; Yihui Tu; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of modular knee replacement : A review of 95 cases.

Authors:  P Cartier; M Mammeri; P Villers
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.