Literature DB >> 23916072

The clinical biomechanics award paper 1993 Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine.

M A Adams1, D S McNally, H Chinn, P Dolan.   

Abstract

The effect of posture on spinal compressive strength was examined in a series of three experiments on cadaveric material. Lumbar 'motion segments', consisting of two vertebrae and the intervening disc and ligaments, were compressed while positioned in various angles of flexion and extension. In the first experiment load sharing between the disc, the apophyseal joint surfaces, and the intervertebral ligaments was inferred from measurements of intradiscal pressure (IDP). Results showed that extension caused the apophyseal joints to become load-bearing, and damage could occur at compressive loads as low as 500 N. Flexion angles greater than about 75% of the full range of flexion (as defined by the posterior ligaments) generated high tensile forces in these ligaments, and caused substantial increases in IDP. The optimum range for resisting compression therefore appeared to be 0-75% flexion. The second experiment compared the distribution of compressive stress within the disc at the endpoints of this range, and showed that at 0% flexion high stress concentrations occur in the posterior annulus of many discs, whereas an even distribution of stress was usually found at 75% flexion. However, the third experiment showed that there was no significant difference in the compressive strength of motion segments positioned in 0% and 75% flexion. A comparison of the range of flexion/ extension movements in vivo and in vitro led us to conclude that in life a position of moderate flexion is to be preferred when the lumbar spine is subjected to high compressive forces.
Copyright © 1994. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1994        PMID: 23916072     DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(94)90052-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  22 in total

1.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry.

Authors:  Daniel M Skrzypiec; Phillip Pollintine; Andrzej Przybyla; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Vertebral deformity arising from an accelerated "creep" mechanism.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Phillip Pollintine; Edward Gomm; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Tobias Consmüller; Marcel Dreischarf; Maxim Bashkuev; Alexander Disch; Esther Pries; Georg N Duda; Hendrik Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Nucleus pulposus deformation in response to lumbar spine lateral flexion: an in vivo MRI investigation.

Authors:  Peter J Fazey; Hiroshi Takasaki; Kevin P Singer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Abnormal stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs following damage to the vertebral bodies: a cause of disc failure?

Authors:  M A Adams; D S McNally; J Wagstaff; A E Goodship
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effective modulus of the human intervertebral disc and its effect on vertebral bone stress.

Authors:  Haisheng Yang; Michael G Jekir; Maxwell W Davis; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Significance of cartilage endplate within herniated disc tissue.

Authors:  Polly Lama; Uruj Zehra; Christian Balkovec; Henry A Claireaux; Luke Flower; Ian J Harding; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Erin M Mannen; Rebecca Tromp; Benjamin M Wong; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Elizabeth A Friis; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Kyphosed seated postures: extending concepts of postural health beyond the office.

Authors:  Jennifer Pynt; Martin G Mackey; Joy Higgs
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.