Literature DB >> 23914311

Environmental stress and transposon transcription in the mammalian brain.

Richard G Hunter1, Bruce S McEwen, Donald W Pfaff.   

Abstract

We recently reported that acute stress causes a substantial upregulation of the epigenetic mark, Histone H3 Lysine 9 Trimethyl (H3K9me3) in the rat hippocampus within an hour of acute stress exposure. To determine the function of this change we used ChIP-sequencing to determine where this silencing mark was being localized. We found that it showed a strong bias toward localization at more active classes of retrotransposable elements and away from genes. Further, we showed that the change was functional in that it reduced transcription of some of these elements (notably the endogenous retrovirus IAP and the B2 SINE). In this commentary we examine these results, which appear to describe a selective genomic stress response and relate it to human health and disease, particularly stress related maladies such as Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, which have recently been shown to have both epigenetic elements in their causation as well as differences in epigenetic marking of retrotransposons in human patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromatin; corticosteroid; epigenetic; heterochromatin; hippocampus; post-traumatic stress disorder

Year:  2013        PMID: 23914311      PMCID: PMC3681740          DOI: 10.4161/mge.24555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mob Genet Elements        ISSN: 2159-2543


Introduction

Stress is a common life event, which has substantial, often long-term, effects upon the brain and behavior. Stress can induce structural changes in the brain and contribute to a variety of chronic diseases from post-traumatic stress disorder to depression to diabetes., Much fruitful work has come from the study of stress since the discipline was pioneered by Selye decades ago. The ability of stress to cause persistent changes has long been of interest to neurobiologists and clinicians, as has the apparent variability in resilience to stress within populations, even those which are relatively genetically similar such as inbred strains of laboratory animals. As a consequence, epigenetic explanations for the effects of stress upon the brain and behavior have been sought and, with increasing frequency, found., Our own work established that large, rapid (less than 2 h) and regionally selective increases in the heterochromatin mark Histone 3 Lysine 9 trimethyl (H3K9me3) within the rat hippocampus as a consequence of acute restraint stress, a standard rodent model of moderate acute stress. This change persisted for at least 24 h but had begun to habituate by 7 d of repeated stress and was absent after 3 weeks. Whether this represents learning or adaptation to a predictable stressor is, as yet, uncertain. Most observations of epigenetic changes in as a consequence of stress involve relatively constrained regions of the genome, such as a single promoter CpG island or transcriptional start site. As the change we observed was of a large magnitude and seemed to involve a rapid and metabolically expensive increase in heterochromatin we wondered if it might involve control of potentially destabilizing mobile genetic elements in the genomes of hippocampal neurons. Decades before the complete sequencing of a mammalian genome it was known that much, if not most of the genome did not consist of genes. However, little interest was shown in this genomic terra incognita as it had been pronounced “junk” by eminences such as Francis Crick and Susumu Ohno., It was assumed that most of this DNA was silent and irrelevant to function or phenotype. More recently, due in large part to the results obtained by the ENCODE project, it has become clear that not only is most of this DNA transcriptionally active, but many have functional roles as well. While some have argued that transposable elements are purely parasitic, their discoverer, McClintock, felt they had adaptive use under conditions of stress. As is often the case in biology, both perspectives contain some truth. These elements have been implicated in processes as diverse as transcriptional regulation, A to I editing, RNA splicing and subcellular localization., In the context of the central nervous system, it has recently been established that transposition of LINE elements plays a regular part in neural development and neurogenesis, perhaps playing a role in generating neuronal diversity similar to that played by the V(D)J system in generating diversity in the immune system., However they are also implicated in a number of disorders, such as cancer. With regard to the nervous system the Alu SINEs have been shown to have altered expression in neurodegenerative diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob and Alzheimer disease and as a principle player in the pathogenesis of age related macular degeneration of the retina. The latter paper is particularly interesting in that the mechanism of Alu RNA induced cell death and degeneration was via inflammasome activation, suggesting that excess transposon expression, can, like stress, contribute to “brain weathering” and accelerated aging.

Stress Induced Epigenetic Silencing of Transposons in the Hippocampus

The neurons of the mammalian hippocampus are unique in a number of ways. They are responsible for the formation of long-term memories and are one of only a few populations of adult neurons with a resident stem cell population and active neurogenesis. Further, they are exquisitely sensitive to the effects of environmental stress and glucocorticoid stress hormones.,, Stress can lower the levels of neurogenesis and cause profound structural changes in the dendritic arbors of hippocampal pyramidal cells., Given their terminally differentiated status, sensitivity to stress and role in memory formation, we reasoned that they may require an active mechanism to control unstable genomic elements, like retrotransposons, which would endanger their ability to maintain their function and specialized phenotype across a lifetime. We suspected that the rapid increase in H3K9me3 we observed was a part of such a genomic stability mechanism as it would rapidly silence large regions of the genome and reduce the likelihood of stress causing transpositions or transcriptional disruptions. When acute stress induced H3K9me3 levels in the rat hippocampus were examined using ChIP Sequencing, we observed little change in the levels of the mark within gene bodies or promoters. Instead, as we had predicted, H3K9me3 reads associated with transposons and repetitive elements increased by 32% from control levels. When the number of transposable or repetitive element loci showing increases in H3K9me3 after stress was compared with those showing decreases the trend was even more marked, more than 59,000 loci showed an increase with stress while only 1,400 or so showed a decrease. While other groups have shown changes in brain H3K9 methylation in association with environmental influences such as treatment with drugs of abuse, e.g.,, they have not observed the same directionality of effect, suggesting a unique function for the effects we have observed in the hippocampus. Phylogenetic analysis of the types of elements showing the largest increases in H3K9me3 revealed an interesting pattern, the more active classes of retrotransposable elements, LINEs, SINEs and ERV/LTR showed higher levels of the silencing mark after stress, while more stable elements like simple repeats and DNA transposons were more likely either to not change or show a reduction in the levels of the mark (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Phylogenetic breakdown of numbers of 5 kb mobile or repetitive element genomic islands showing increased H3Kme3 levels (Stress Up) vs. reduced levels (Stress Down). Adapted from reference 25.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic breakdown of numbers of 5 kb mobile or repetitive element genomic islands showing increased H3Kme3 levels (Stress Up) vs. reduced levels (Stress Down). Adapted from reference 25. In line with the generally repressive role for H3K9me3 we found that acute stress was associated with the suppression of transcription of the RNAs for some of these elements, notably the rodent SINE, B2 and the rodent ERV IAP elements. In keeping with our observations of H3K9me3 levels after stress, this suppression was not observed in the other brain regions tested (frontal cortex and cerebellum) or in peripheral tissues like liver, heart or skeletal muscle. In an attempt to begin to elucidate the mechanism by which the increase in H3K9me3 in the hippocampus might be mediated, we examined the expression of the histone H3 lysine 9 specific methyltransferases G9a, GLP, Suv39h1 and h2 with RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. We found no change in G9a, GLP or Suv39h1 with either method, though we did see an increase in Suv39h2 expression within 30 min of stress onset (Fig. 2). Using ChIP Sequencing targeted at the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), we demonstrated that acute corticosterone treatment induces increased binding of GR in the region of the Suv39h2 gene, suggesting that the increase in H3K9me3 is mediated by the genomic action of the GR. Thus the apparent specificity of the effect to the rodent hippocampus may be due to its high levels of GR expression relative to other brain regions. In humans, where GR is more highly expressed in cortex in addition to hippocampus,- this effect may therefore be more widespread in our own species.

Figure 2. Levels of the H3K9 specific methyltransferases Suv39h2 mRNA in rat hippocampus under basal conditions and 1 h after acute stress. Adapted from reference 25.

Figure 2. Levels of the H3K9 specific methyltransferases Suv39h2 mRNA in rat hippocampus under basal conditions and 1 h after acute stress. Adapted from reference 25.

A Genomic Stress Response

Taken in sum these findings are suggestive that, at least in certain stress sensitive tissues like the hippocampus, there is an active regulatory mechanism governing the expression of a large number of mobile genetic elements and that it is subject to regulation by activated GR. As hippocampal neurons are vital to long-term memory formation and their loss or instability would reduce the ability to encode new memory, the hypothesis that this response is a genomic stability mechanism is an appealing one. An alternate, but not mutually exclusive hypothesis derives from the contrast of our findings with regard to the downregulation of Alu like SINE elements by restraint stress with the findings of the Goodrich lab (see above) with regard to heat shock. They found that heat shock increased the expression of B2 and Alu RNA and that the RNA bound RNA polII and blocked transcription of a number of genes, and a similar rise in B2 elements has been observed in models of stroke. This sort of transcriptional repression would be a useful means of preventing the accumulation of mis-folded proteins during hyperthermic episodes or severe brain injury. On the other hand, suppression of protein synthesis, upon which long-term memory formation depends,, during a stressful and potentially life threatening (but not physically damaging) event would obviate one of the major adaptive benefits of having memory in the first place: remembering how to avoid stress and death Thus the actions of transposable elements in the brain seem to be encoded to the type and severity of the threat to the organ and the organism. Of particular interest in this regard is the recent observation that Alu and LINE elements are differentially methylated in combat veterans who have acquired post-traumatic stress disorder vs. combat veterans who do not. Given the transgenerational epigenetic nature of PTSD,, and our own work, one could hypothesize that the disorder might involve a failure of the sort of genomic stress response we describe here. Together these results suggests that the expression of at least some transposable elements may be as exquisitely regulated and environmentally tuned as any gene. Whether this is the case for the majority of these elements remains to be seen. What occurs when this (at this point speculative) system fails to function properly is another question. Stress and corticosteroid action have been linked to a variety of disorders, but rarely in a consistent one to one fashion, such as might be seen with a rabies infection, where the mere presence of live virus in a patient is necessary and sufficient for the disease. Stress related diseases show highly variable levels of resilience within both human populations and laboratory animals. While the reasons for some of this variance have been successfully explicated, much remains unexplained. It is certainly tempting to imagine that some of this variation might arise from inter-individual diversity of transposable elements a phenomenon that is now well established in humans. A related and perhaps more obvious question is: does stress increase the level of somatic transposition in the brain or elsewhere? If so it seems likely that this could have far reaching consequences for human health and disease.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Somatic mosaicism in neuronal precursor cells mediated by L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Alysson R Muotri; Vi T Chu; Maria C N Marchetto; Wei Deng; John V Moran; Fred H Gage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 5.  Mobile genetic elements and cancer. From mutations to gene therapy.

Authors:  I A Kozeretska; S V Demydov; L I Ostapchenko
Journal:  Exp Oncol       Date:  2011-12

6.  So much "junk" DNA in our genome.

Authors:  S Ohno
Journal:  Brookhaven Symp Biol       Date:  1972

7.  DNA methylation in repetitive elements and post-traumatic stress disorder: a case-control study of US military service members.

Authors:  Jennifer A Rusiecki; Ligong Chen; Vasantha Srikantan; Lei Zhang; Liying Yan; Matthew L Polin; Andrea Baccarelli
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.778

8.  Cocaine dynamically regulates heterochromatin and repetitive element unsilencing in nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Ian Maze; Jian Feng; Matthew B Wilkinson; HaoSheng Sun; Li Shen; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Maternal, not paternal, PTSD is related to increased risk for PTSD in offspring of Holocaust survivors.

Authors:  Rachel Yehuda; Amanda Bell; Linda M Bierer; James Schmeidler
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Human Alu RNA is a modular transacting repressor of mRNA transcription during heat shock.

Authors:  Peter D Mariner; Ryan D Walters; Celso A Espinoza; Linda F Drullinger; Stacey D Wagner; Jennifer F Kugel; James A Goodrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Stress and the dynamic genome: Steroids, epigenetics, and the transposome.

Authors:  Richard G Hunter; Khatuna Gagnidze; Bruce S McEwen; Donald W Pfaff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Stress - (self) eating: Epigenetic regulation of autophagy in response to psychological stress.

Authors:  Deepika Puri; Deepa Subramanyam
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 3.  Mechanisms of stress in the brain.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen; Nicole P Bowles; Jason D Gray; Matthew N Hill; Richard G Hunter; Ilia N Karatsoreos; Carla Nasca
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Experience and the ever-changing brain: what the transcriptome can reveal.

Authors:  Todd G Rubin; Jason D Gray; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 5.  ALS and FTD: an epigenetic perspective.

Authors:  Veronique V Belzil; Rebecca B Katzman; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  A single whole-body low dose X-irradiation does not affect L1, B1 and IAP repeat element DNA methylation longitudinally.

Authors:  Michelle R Newman; Pamela J Sykes; Benjamin J Blyth; Eva Bezak; Mark D Lawrence; Katherine L Morel; Rebecca J Ormsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recognizing Resilience: Learning from the Effects of Stress on the Brain.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen; Jason Gray; Carla Nasca
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2015-01-01

8.  DNA N6-methyladenine is dynamically regulated in the mouse brain following environmental stress.

Authors:  Bing Yao; Ying Cheng; Zhiqin Wang; Yujing Li; Li Chen; Luoxiu Huang; Wenxin Zhang; Dahua Chen; Hao Wu; Beisha Tang; Peng Jin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Transposable Elements and Stress in Vertebrates: An Overview.

Authors:  Anna Maria Pappalardo; Venera Ferrito; Maria Assunta Biscotti; Adriana Canapa; Teresa Capriglione
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Transposable elements in cancer as a by-product of stress-induced evolvability.

Authors:  Tobias Mourier; Lars P Nielsen; Anders J Hansen; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.