Literature DB >> 19567697

Split views among parents regarding children's right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey.

U Swartling1, G Helgesson, M G Hansson, J Ludvigsson.   

Abstract

Based on extensive questionnaire data, this paper focuses on parents' views about children's right to decide about participation in research. The data originates from 4000 families participating in a longitudinal prospective screening as 1997. Although current regulations and recommendations underline that children should have influence over their participation, many parents in this study disagree. Most (66%) were positive providing information to the child about relevant aspects of the study. However, responding parents were split about whether or not children should at some point be allowed decisional authority when participating in research: 41.6% of the parents reported being against or unsure. Those who responded positively believed that children should be allowed to decide about blood-sampling procedures (70%), but to a less extent about participation (48.5%), analyses of samples (19.7%) and biological bank storage (15.4%). That as many as possible should remain in the study, and that children do not have the competence to understand the consequences for research was strongly stressed by respondents who do not think children should have a right to decide. When asked what interests they consider most important in paediatric research, child autonomy and decision-making was ranked lowest. We discuss the implications of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567697     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2008.027383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Empirically-derived Knowledge on Adolescent Assent to Pediatric Biomedical Research.

Authors:  David G Scherer; Janet L Brody; Robert D Annett; Charles Turner; Jeanne Dalen; Yesel Yoon
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013

2.  Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson; Ulrica Swartling
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.

Authors:  Kenneth P Tercyak; Ulrica Swartling; Darren Mays; Suzanne Bennett Johnson; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013-01-01

4.  Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Karen Melham; Jane Kaye; Johannes J M van Delden; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  How should assent to research be sought in low income settings? Perspectives from parents and children in Southern Malawi.

Authors:  Helen Mangochi; Kate Gooding; Aisleen Bennett; Michael Parker; Nicola Desmond; Susan Bull
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  How are European birth-cohort studies engaging and consulting with young cohort members?

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Debra Allnock; Tricia Jessiman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Emerging issues in paediatric health research consent forms in Canada: working towards best practices.

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Denise Avard; Lee Black; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.