Literature DB >> 23913945

The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community.

Hannah M ter Hofstede1, Holger R Goerlitz, John M Ratcliffe, Marc W Holderied, Annemarie Surlykke.   

Abstract

Insects with bat-detecting ears are ideal animals for investigating sensory system adaptations to predator cues. Noctuid moths have two auditory receptors (A1 and A2) sensitive to the ultrasonic echolocation calls of insectivorous bats. Larger moths are detected at greater distances by bats than smaller moths. Larger moths also have lower A1 best thresholds, allowing them to detect bats at greater distances and possibly compensating for their increased conspicuousness. Interestingly, the sound frequency at the lowest threshold is lower in larger than in smaller moths, suggesting that the relationship between threshold and size might vary across frequencies used by different bat species. Here, we demonstrate that the relationships between threshold and size in moths were only significant at some frequencies, and these frequencies differed between three locations (UK, Canada and Denmark). The relationships were more likely to be significant at call frequencies used by proportionately more bat species in the moths' specific bat community, suggesting an association between the tuning of moth ears and the cues provided by sympatric predators. Additionally, we found that the best threshold and best frequency of the less sensitive A2 receptor are also related to size, and that these relationships hold when controlling for evolutionary relationships. The slopes of best threshold versus size differ, however, such that the difference in threshold between A1 and A2 is greater for larger than for smaller moths. The shorter time from A1 to A2 excitation in smaller than in larger moths could potentially compensate for shorter absolute detection distances in smaller moths.

Keywords:  allotonic frequency hypothesis; constant-frequency echolocation; horseshoe bats; predator–prey interactions; sensory ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913945     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.093294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

Review 1.  Selective forces on origin, adaptation and reduction of tympanal ears in insects.

Authors:  Johannes Strauß; Andreas Stumpner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Moth hearing and sound communication.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Deaf moths employ acoustic Müllerian mimicry against bats using wingbeat-powered tymbals.

Authors:  Liam J O'Reilly; David J L Agassiz; Thomas R Neil; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Delayed response and biosonar perception explain movement coordination in trawling bats.

Authors:  Luca Giuggioli; Thomas J McKetterick; Marc Holderied
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 6.  The Common Fruit-Piercing Moth in the Pacific Region: A Survey of the Current State of a Significant Worldwide Economic Pest, Eudocima phalonia (Lepidoptera: Erebidae), with a Focus on New Caledonia.

Authors:  Lise Leroy; Christian Mille; Bruno Fogliani
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Ultrasonic predator-prey interactions in water-convergent evolution with insects and bats in air?

Authors:  Maria Wilson; Magnus Wahlberg; Annemarie Surlykke; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.