Literature DB >> 30723216

Deaf moths employ acoustic Müllerian mimicry against bats using wingbeat-powered tymbals.

Liam J O'Reilly1, David J L Agassiz2, Thomas R Neil1, Marc W Holderied3.   

Abstract

Emitting ultrasound upon hearing an attacking bat is an effective defence strategy used by several moth taxa. Here we reveal how Yponomeuta moths acquire sophisticated acoustic protection despite being deaf themselves and hence unable to respond to bat attacks. Instead, flying Yponomeuta produce bursts of ultrasonic clicks perpetually; a striated patch in their hind wing clicks as the beating wing rotates and bends. This wing structure is strikingly similar to the thorax tymbals with which arctiine moths produce their anti-bat sounds. And indeed, Yponomeuta sounds closely mimic such arctiine signals, revealing convergence in form and function. Because both moth taxa contain noxious compounds, we conclude they are mutual Müllerian acoustic mimics. Yponomeuta's perpetual clicking would however also attract bat predators. In response, their click amplitude is reduced and affords acoustic protection just as far as required, matching the distance over which bat biosonar would pick up Yponomeuta echoes anyway - advanced acoustic defences for a deaf moth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30723216      PMCID: PMC6363749          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37812-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  23 in total

1.  Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; Marie L Nydam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Moths are not silent, but whisper ultrasonic courtship songs.

Authors:  R Nakano; T Takanashi; T Fujii; N Skals; A Surlykke; Y Ishikawa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.

Authors:  Nickolay I Hristov; William E Conner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-17

4.  Plant secondary metabolites as mammalian feeding deterrents: separating the effects of the taste of salicin from its post-ingestive consequences in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  G J Pass; W J Foley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Hemprich's long-eared bat (Otonycteris hemprichii) as a predator of scorpions: whispering echolocation, passive gleaning and prey selection.

Authors:  Marc Holderied; Carmi Korine; Thorsten Moritz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Molecular phylogeny of the small ermine moth genus Yponomeuta (Lepidoptera, Yponomeutidae) in the palaearctic.

Authors:  Hubert Turner; Niek Lieshout; Wil E Van Ginkel; Steph B J Menken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales.

Authors:  Ryo Nakano; Niels Skals; Takuma Takanashi; Annemarie Surlykke; Takuji Koike; Keisuke Yoshida; Hirotaka Maruyama; Sadahiro Tatsuki; Yukio Ishikawa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Sound production by abdominal tymbal organs in two moth species: the green silver-line and the scarce silver-line (Noctuoidea: Nolidae: Chloephorinae).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  De novo synthesis vs. sequestration: negatively correlated metabolic traits and the evolution of host plant specialization in cyanogenic butterflies.

Authors:  Helene S Engler-Chaouat; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.793

View more
  5 in total

1.  Moth wings are acoustic metamaterials.

Authors:  Thomas R Neil; Zhiyuan Shen; Daniel Robert; Bruce W Drinkwater; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thoracic scales of moths as a stealth coating against bat biosonar.

Authors:  Thomas R Neil; Zhiyuan Shen; Daniel Robert; Bruce W Drinkwater; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Fireflies produce ultrasonic clicks during flight as a potential aposematic anti-bat signal.

Authors:  Ksenia Krivoruchko; Aya Goldshtein; Arjan Boonman; Ofri Eitan; Jonathan Ben-Simon; Vu Dinh Thong; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-02-16

5.  The Ander's organ: a mechanism for anti-predator ultrasound in a relict orthopteran.

Authors:  Charlie Woodrow; Kevin A Judge; Christian Pulver; Thorin Jonsson; Fernando Montealegre-Z
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.312

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.