Literature DB >> 23891195

Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task.

Jeremy Harper1, Stephen M Malone2, Edward M Bernat3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent work indicates that the feedback negativity and P3 components from gambling feedback tasks can be understood as mixtures of functionally distinct processes occurring separately in theta and delta frequency bands. The current study was conducted to assess whether dissociable processes occurring in the theta and delta bands would similarly account for activity underlying N2 and P3 components in a go/no-go task.
METHODS: The current study measured EEG signals from 66 participants during a go/no-go task, and a time-frequency principal components analysis decomposition approach was used to extract theta and delta measures from condition averages.
RESULTS: Theta and delta measures separately increased in relation to response inhibition, and were uniquely related to the N2 and P3 components, as predicted.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the view that the theta and delta measures indexed separable processes related to response inhibition, and better indexed the processes underlying N2 and P3 components in this go/no-go task. SIGNIFICANCE: Theta and delta measures may index separable functional processes across other common ERP tasks, and may represent an improved target for research relative to standard time-domain components.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delta; EEG; Response inhibition; Theta; Time–frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23891195      PMCID: PMC4312493          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  62 in total

1.  Multiple time-frequency components account for the complex functional reactivity of P300.

Authors:  J Yordanova; M Devrim; V Kolev; A Ademoglu; T Demiralp
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

3.  The role of brain oscillations as functional correlates of cognitive systems: a study of frontal inhibitory control in alcoholism.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Kevin A Jones; Keewhan Choi; David B Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.

Authors:  Robert J Barry
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.

Authors:  B Kopp; U Mattler; R Goertz; F Rist
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-07

7.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

8.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Responses of human anterior cingulate cortex microdomains to error detection, conflict monitoring, stimulus-response mapping, familiarity, and orienting.

Authors:  Chunmao Wang; Istvan Ulbert; Donald L Schomer; Ksenija Marinkovic; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  52 in total

1.  The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.

Authors:  Huibin Jia; Huayun Li; Dongchuan Yu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.

Authors:  Edward M Bernat; Lindsay D Nelson; Arielle R Baskin-Sommers
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks.

Authors:  Alberto J González-Villar; F Mauricio Bonilla; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Adolescent cognitive control, theta oscillations, and social observation.

Authors:  George A Buzzell; Tyson V Barker; Sonya V Troller-Renfree; Edward M Bernat; Maureen E Bowers; Santiago Morales; Lindsay C Bowman; Heather A Henderson; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Impact of alcohol use on EEG dynamics of response inhibition: a cotwin control analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.280

7.  Independent contributions of theta and delta time-frequency activity to the visual oddball P3b.

Authors:  Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Immediate versus delayed control demands elicit distinct mechanisms for instantiating proactive control.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Janowich; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.