Literature DB >> 27160368

When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks.

Alberto J González-Villar1, F Mauricio Bonilla2, María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña3.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that mental rehearsal activates brain areas similar to those activated by real performance. Although inhibition is a key function of human behavior, there are no previous reports of brain activity during imagined response cancellation. We analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) and time-frequency data associated with motor execution and inhibition during real and imagined performance of a stop-signal task. The ERPs characteristic of stop trials-that is, the stop-N2 and stop-P3-were also observed during covert performance of the task. Imagined stop (IS) trials yielded smaller stop-N2 amplitudes than did successful stop (SS) and unsuccessful stop (US) trials, but midfrontal theta power similar to that in SS trials. The stop-P3 amplitude for IS was intermediate between those observed for SS and US. The results may be explained by the absence of error-processing and correction processes during imagined performance. For go trials, real execution was associated with higher mu and beta desynchronization over motor areas, which confirms previous reports of lower motor activation during imagined execution and also with larger P3b amplitudes, probably indicating increased top-down attention to the real task. The similar patterns of activity observed for imagined and real performance suggest that imagination tasks may be useful for training inhibitory processes. Nevertheless, brain activation was generally weaker during mental rehearsal, probably as a result of the reduced engagement of top-down mechanisms and limited error processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; Mental rehearsal; Motor inhibition; Stop-signal task; Time-frequency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160368     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0434-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  61 in total

1.  Neural correlates of mental rehearsal in dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Beta rebound after different types of motor imagery in man.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; C Neuper; C Brunner; F Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Stuart J Johnstone; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Limb (hand vs. foot) and response conflict have similar effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded during motor imagery and overt execution.

Authors:  M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña; C Lastra-Barreira; S Galdo-Alvarez
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Evaluation of cortical connectivity during real and imagined rhythmic finger tapping.

Authors:  Maria L Stavrinou; Liviu Moraru; Laura Cimponeriu; Stefania Della Penna; Anastasios Bezerianos
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Equivalent is not equal: primary motor cortex (MI) activation during motor imagery and execution of sequential movements.

Authors:  M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña; S Galdo-Alvarez; C Lastra-Barreira
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Carsten Konrad; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.

Authors:  Mariana Schmajuk; Mario Liotti; Laura Busse; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The role of trait impulsivity in response inhibition: event-related potentials in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Shen; Der-Song Lee; Chia-ling Chen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism.

Authors:  S R Pliszka; M Liotti; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inhibition-related differences between tic-free and tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from the N2 and P3.

Authors:  L Kloft; A Riesel; N Kathmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural correlates of unpredictable Stop and non-Stop cues in overt and imagined execution.

Authors:  Alberto González-Villar; Santiago Galdo-Álvarez; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.348

3.  Temporal Dynamics of Event-Related Potentials during Inhibitory Control Characterize Age-Related Neural Compensation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Paitel; Kristy A Nielson
Journal:  Symmetry (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.940

4.  Functional Equivalence of Imagined vs. Real Performance of an Inhibitory Task: An EEG/ERP Study.

Authors:  Santiago Galdo-Alvarez; Fidel M Bonilla; Alberto J González-Villar; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Response inhibition alterations in migraine: evidence from event-related potentials and evoked oscillations.

Authors:  Guoliang Chen; Yansong Li; Zhao Dong; Rongfei Wang; Dengfa Zhao; Ignacio Obeso; Shengyuan Yu
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 7.277

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.