Literature DB >> 25581491

Time-frequency theta and delta measures index separable components of feedback processing in a gambling task.

Edward M Bernat1, Lindsay D Nelson, Arielle R Baskin-Sommers.   

Abstract

Previous work using gambling tasks indicate that the feedback negativity (FN) reflects primary or salient stimulus attributes (often gain vs. loss), whereas the feedback-P300 appears sensitive to secondary stimulus information. A recent time-frequency approach has characterized separable theta (3-7 Hz) and delta (0-3 Hz) feedback processes, independently sensitive to primary feedback attributes, specifically loss and gain outcomes, respectively. The current study extends this time-frequency work to evaluate both primary and secondary (relative outcome and outcome magnitude) feedback attributes. Consistent with previous reports, theta indexed an initial, lower-level response sensitive to the primary (most salient) feedback attributes (specifically losses), while delta was sensitive to both primary attributes (specifically gains) and assessed secondary stimulus features.
© 2015 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delta; ERP; Event-related potential; FN; Feedback negativity; Gambling; P300; Theta; Time-frequency analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25581491      PMCID: PMC4398588          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  39 in total

1.  Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Zhiheng Zhou; Rongjun Yu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Greg Hajcak; Jeff T Larsen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Decomposing delta, theta, and alpha time-frequency ERP activity from a visual oddball task using PCA.

Authors:  Edward M Bernat; Stephen M Malone; William J Williams; Christopher J Patrick; William G Iacono
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 5.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  Christian Bellebaum; Irene Daum
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  29 in total

1.  Functional heterogeneity of perceived control in feedback processing.

Authors:  Ya Zheng; Mengyao Wang; Shiyu Zhou; Jing Xu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Stimulus sequence context differentially modulates inhibition-related theta and delta band activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Abnormal approach-related motivation but spared reinforcement learning in MDD: Evidence from fronto-midline Theta oscillations and frontal Alpha asymmetry.

Authors:  Davide Gheza; Jasmina Bakic; Chris Baeken; Rudi De Raedt; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Independent contributions of theta and delta time-frequency activity to the visual oddball P3b.

Authors:  Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Time-frequency approaches to investigating changes in feedback processing during childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  M E Bowers; G A Buzzell; E M Bernat; N A Fox; T V Barker
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Abnormal neural responses to feedback in depressed adolescents.

Authors:  Christian A Webb; Randy P Auerbach; Erin Bondy; Colin H Stanton; Dan Foti; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Expectancy effects in feedback processing are explained primarily by time-frequency delta not theta.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Time-Frequency Reward-Related Delta Prospectively Predicts the Development of Adolescent-Onset Depression.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Zachary P Infantolino; Daniel N Klein; Greg Perlman; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-08-07

9.  Effects of reward context on feedback processing as indexed by time-frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adreanna T M Watts; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Jeremy Harper; Stephen M Malone; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.