Literature DB >> 23889183

Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery: clinical article.

Vidya M Bhalodia1, Daniel M Schwartz, Anthony K Sestokas, Gary Bloomgarden, Thomas Arkins, Patrick Tomak, Judith Gorelick, Shirvinda Wijesekera, John Beiner, Isaac Goodrich.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Deltoid muscle weakness due to C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication. Symptoms can manifest upon emergence from anesthesia or days to weeks following surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of spontaneous electromyography (spEMG) monitoring in detecting evolving C-5 nerve root compromise. By contrast, transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potential (tceMEP) monitoring has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying impending C-5 injury. In this study the authors sought to 1) determine the frequency of immediate versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery, 2) identify risk factors associated with the development of C-5 palsies, and 3) determine whether tceMEP and spEMG neuromonitoring can help to identify acutely evolving C-5 injury as well as predict delayed-onset deltoid muscle paresis.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the neuromonitoring and surgical records of all patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery involving the C-4 and/or C-5 level in the period from 2006 to 2008. Real-time tceMEP and spEMG monitoring from the deltoid muscle was performed as part of a multimodal neuromonitoring protocol during all surgeries. Charts were reviewed to identify patients who had experienced significant changes in tceMEPs and/or episodes of neurotonic spEMG activity during surgery, as well as those who had shown new-onset deltoid weakness either immediately upon emergence from the anesthesia or in a delayed fashion.
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing 235 cervical spine surgeries involving the C4-5 level served as the study cohort. The overall incidence of perioperative C-5 nerve root injury was 5.1%. The incidence was greatest (50%) in cases with dual corpectomies at the C-4 and C-5 spinal levels. All patients who emerged from anesthesia with deltoid weakness had significant and unresolved changes in tceMEPs during surgery, whereas only 1 had remarkable spEMG activity. Sensitivity and specificity of tceMEP monitoring for identifying acute-onset deltoid weakness were 100% and 99%, respectively. By contrast, sensitivity and specificity for spEMG were only 20% and 92%, respectively. Neither modality was effective in identifying patients who demonstrated delayed-onset deltoid weakness.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of new-onset deltoid muscle weakness following cervical spine surgery is greatest for patients undergoing 2-level corpectomies involving C-4 and C-5. Transcranial electrical stimulation-induced MEP monitoring is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting C-5 radiculopathy that manifests immediately upon waking from anesthesia. While the absence of sustained spEMG activity does not rule out nerve root irritation, the presence of excessive neurotonic discharges serves both to alert the surgeon of such potentially injurious events and to prompt neuromonitoring personnel about the need for additional tceMEP testing. Delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury cannot be predicted by intraoperative neuromonitoring via either modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23889183     DOI: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  10 in total

1.  Utility of intraoperative monitoring with motor-evoked potential during the surgical enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannoma.

Authors:  Hiromi Sasaki; Satoshi Nagano; Masahiro Yokouchi; Takao Setoguchi; Hirofumi Shimada; Takuya Yamamoto; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Delayed postoperative C5 root palsy and the use of neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Steven Spitz; Daniel Felbaum; Nima Aghdam; Faheem Sandhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Incidence of peripheral nerve injury during shoulder arthroplasty when motor evoked potentials are monitored.

Authors:  Alexander W Aleem; W Bryan Wilent; Alexa C Narzikul; Andrew F Kuntz; Edward S Chang; Gerald R Williams; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Francisco Revilla-Pacheco; Shoko Watanabe; Joel Rodríguez-Reyes; Claudia Sánchez-Torres; Paul Shkurovich-Bialik; Tenoch Herrada-Pineda; Pamela Rodríguez-Salgado; Juvenal Franco-Granillo; Martín Calderón-Juárez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Authors:  Chae-Hong Lim; Sung-Woo Roh; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sang-Ryong Jeon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The Efficacy of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Using Transcranial Electrically Stimulated Muscle-evoked Potentials (TcE-MsEPs) for Predicting Postoperative Segmental Upper Extremity Motor Paresis After Cervical Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yasushi Fujiwara; Hideki Manabe; Bunichiro Izumi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Kazumi Kawai; Nobuhiro Tanaka
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Postoperative Delayed Cervical Palsies: Understanding the Etiology.

Authors:  Ryan F Planchard; Patrick R Maloney; Grant W Mallory; Ross C Puffer; Robert J Spinner; Ahmad Nassr; Jeremy L Fogelson; William E Krauss; Michelle J Clarke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-01-05

8.  Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Disappearance versus Amplitude-Decrement Alarm Criteria During Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Long-Term Prognosis.

Authors:  Dong Gun Kim; Young Doo Choi; Seung Hyun Jin; Chi Heon Kim; Kwang Woo Lee; Kyung Seok Park; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Epidemiology of C5 Palsy after Cervical Spine Surgery: A 21-Center Study.

Authors:  Jae Keun Oh; Jae Taek Hong; Dong Ho Kang; Sang-Woo Kim; Seok Won Kim; Young Jin Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Jun Jae Shin; Seong Yi; Jung Kil Lee; Jun Ho Lee; Chang-Hyun Lee; Ho Jin Lee; Hyoung-Joon Chun; Dae-Chul Cho; Yong Eun Cho; Yong Jun Jin; Kyung-Chul Choi; In Ho Han; Seung-Jae Hyun; Jung-Woo Hur; Ki-Jeong Kim
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

10.  Complications of minimally invasive, tubular access surgery for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Donald A Ross
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-07-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.