Literature DB >> 27342613

Clinical analysis of C5 palsy after cervical decompression surgery: relationship between recovery duration and clinical and radiological factors.

Chae-Hong Lim1, Sung-Woo Roh2, Seung-Chul Rhim1, Sang-Ryong Jeon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative C5 palsy is a widely known complication of cervical decompression surgery. Many studies have focused on its etiology and factors affecting it. However, no study to date has evaluated the association between the clinical outcome and recovery duration of post-operative C5 palsy. We evaluated this in our current report.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 710 consecutive degenerative cervical spine decompression surgeries performed in a single institution. We included all patients who underwent any type of surgical procedure for cervical spinal stenosis, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), or cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Demographic, radiologic, clinical information was recorded. Finally, correlation analysis was conducted to identify demographic, radiologic, or clinical factors related with recovery duration (within or after 6 months).
RESULTS: The incident rate of postoperative C5 palsy was 5.1 % (36/710 cases). Analysis of recovery duration revealed that 18 patients had recovered within 6 months and 33 (91.7 %) within 2 years, whilst 3 individuals (8.3 %) had not fully recovered within the follow-up period. Factors related to longer recovery (>6 months) included motor grade ≤2 (p < 0.001), presence of multi-segment paresis involving more than the C5 root (p = 0.002), loss of somatic sensation with pain (p = 0.008), and the degree of posterior spinal cord shifting (p = 0.040). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that motor grade ≤2 (p = 0.010) had a significant effect on a recovery duration beyond 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: A motor grade ≤2, the presence of multi-segment paresis involving more than the C5 root, the loss of somatic sensation with pain, and the degree of posterior spinal cord shifting significantly influence whether the duration of recovery from postoperative C5 palsy will take longer than 6 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C5 nerve palsy; Cervical; Degenerative; Postoperative; Recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27342613     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4664-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Yasushi Fujiwara; Naosuke Kamei; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Can prophylactic bilateral C4/C5 foraminotomy prevent postoperative C5 palsy after open-door laminoplasty?: a prospective study.

Authors:  Keiichi Katsumi; Akiyoshi Yamazaki; Kei Watanabe; Masayuki Ohashi; Hirokazu Shoji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Modified plate-only open-door laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Yifei Gu; Jueqian Shi; Rui Gao; Yang Liu; Jun Li; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Dapeng Fan; Daniel M Schwartz; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Correlative study of nerve root palsy and cervical posterior decompression laminectomy and internal fixation.

Authors:  Tielong Liu; Weiwei Zou; Yu Han; Yan Wang
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 6.  C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study.

Authors:  S Imagama; Y Matsuyama; Y Yukawa; N Kawakami; M Kamiya; T Kanemura; N Ishiguro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-03

Review 7.  C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Takahiro Ishii; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yoshiaki Toyama; Morio Matsumoto; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Masahiko Watanabe; Kiyoshi Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminoplasty by bilateral partial foraminotomy.

Authors:  Masashi Komagata; Makoto Nishiyama; Kenji Endo; Hitoshi Ikegami; Satoshi Tanaka; Atsuhiro Imakiire
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prediction of the risk of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion with cervical myelopathy using a support vector machine: an analysis of 184 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Haosheng Wang; Zhi-Ri Tang; Wenle Li; Tingting Fan; Jianwu Zhao; Mingyang Kang; Rongpeng Dong; Yang Qu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2017.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Operative treatment of the degenerative cervical spine].

Authors:  A Tschugg; B Meyer; M Stoffel; P Vajkoczy; F Ringel; S-O Eicker; V Rhode; C Thomé
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  A Delayed Postoperative C5 Palsy due to Spinal Cord Lesion: A Typical Clinical Presentation but Unusual Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Nobuaki Tadokoro; Yusuke Kasai; Katsuhito Kiyasu; Motohiro Kawasaki; Ryuichi Takemasa; Masahiko Ikeuchi
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-12-18

5.  Impact of the surgical strategy on the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy in decompressive cervical surgery.

Authors:  Theresa Krätzig; Malte Mohme; Klaus C Mende; Sven O Eicker; Frank W Floeth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Incidence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical surgery: A meta-analysis for last decade.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Hui Wang; Sen Liu; Wen-Yuan Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Foraminal Ligaments Tether Upper Cervical Nerve Roots: A Potential Cause of Postoperative C5 Palsy.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Brooks R Osburn; Zane A Tymchak; Wyatt L Ramey; Rod J Oskouian; Robert A Hart; Jens R Chapman; Line G Jacques; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2020-07-24

Review 8.  Factors Associated With C5 Palsy Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrew Jack; Wyatt L Ramey; Joseph R Dettori; Zane A Tymchak; Rod J Oskouian; Robert A Hart; Jens R Chapman; Dan Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-11-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.