Literature DB >> 35790650

Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest.

Francisco Revilla-Pacheco1, Shoko Watanabe1, Joel Rodríguez-Reyes2, Claudia Sánchez-Torres2, Paul Shkurovich-Bialik3, Tenoch Herrada-Pineda1, Pamela Rodríguez-Salgado1, Juvenal Franco-Granillo4, Martín Calderón-Juárez5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We show a systematic review of known complications during intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) using transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials (TES-MEP) on cervical spine surgery, which provides a summary of the main findings. A rare complication during this procedure, cardiac arrest by cardioinhibitory reflex, is also described.
METHODS: Findings of 523 scientific papers published from 1995 onwards were reviewed in the following databases: CENTRAL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science. This study evaluated only complications on cervical spine surgery undergoing TES-MEP IONM.
RESULTS: The review of the literature yielded 13 studies on the complications of TES-MEP IONM, from which three were excluded. Five studies are case series; the rest are case reports. Overall, 169 complications on 167 patients were reported in a total of 38,915 patients, a global prevalence of 0.43%. The most common complication was tongue-bite in 129 cases, (76.3% of all complication events). Tongue-bite had a prevalence of 0.33% (CI 95%, 0.28-0.39%) in all patients on TES-MEP IONM. A relatively low prevalence of severe complications was found: cardiac-arrhythmia, bradycardia and seizure, the prevalence of this complications represents only one case in all the sample. Alongside, we report the occurrence of cardiac arrest attributable to TES-MEP IONM.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that TES-MEP is a safe procedure with a very low prevalence of complications. To our best knowledge, asystole is reported for the first time as a complication during TES-MEP IONM.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asystole; Bradycardia; Intraoperative neuromonitoring; Motor evoked potentials; Transcranial electric stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35790650     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07297-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  41 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative monitoring for tethered cord surgery: an update.

Authors:  Karl F Kothbauer; Klaus Novak
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  ACNS Guideline: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring.

Authors:  Alan D Legatt; Ronald G Emerson; Charles M Epstein; David B MacDonald; Vedran Deletis; Ricardo J Bravo; Jaime R López
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 3.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery: clinical article.

Authors:  Vidya M Bhalodia; Daniel M Schwartz; Anthony K Sestokas; Gary Bloomgarden; Thomas Arkins; Patrick Tomak; Judith Gorelick; Shirvinda Wijesekera; John Beiner; Isaac Goodrich
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-07-26

5.  Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations.

Authors:  Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Mittul Gulati; Russell Lyon; Nalin Gupta; Charles Yingling
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Anthony K Sestokas; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Bikash Bose; Mark Li; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Corticospinal activity evoked and modulated by non-invasive stimulation of the intact human motor cortex.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Daniel M Schwartz; Venkat Sethuraman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Joshua D Auerbach; John P Dormans; John Flynn; Denis S Drummond; J Andrew Bowe; Samuel Laufer; Suken A Shah; J Richard Bowen; Peter D Pizzutillo; Kristofer J Jones; Denis S Drummond
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Michael O Kelleher; Gamaliel Tan; Roger Sarjeant; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.