Literature DB >> 29844829

Utility of intraoperative monitoring with motor-evoked potential during the surgical enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannoma.

Hiromi Sasaki1, Satoshi Nagano1, Masahiro Yokouchi1, Takao Setoguchi2, Hirofumi Shimada1, Takuya Yamamoto1, Yasuhiro Ishidou3, Setsuro Komiya1.   

Abstract

Although it is thought that the surgical enucleation of schwannomas can be easily performed, certain patients present with postoperative neurological symptoms. The present study examined the utility of intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP) in predicting neurological deficits following the surgical enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannoma. The current study included 23 patients and MEP was performed using transcranial electrical stimulation. In three cases, the MEP decreased to <50% of the preoperative value; however, in two cases that involved the peroneal nerve and tibial nerve, results appeared to be false positives induced by a tourniquet during surgery. In another case, the MEP was completely lost following enucleation of the tumor from the sciatic nerve, which recovered to 61% of the original MEP within 10 min. This patient presented with common peroneal palsy postoperatively. By contrast, another case involving the lumbar nerve root and in which there was reversible postoperative motor loss, the MEP did not change intraoperatively. Postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 22% of patients in the present study, which is similar to that of previous reports. The present study also demonstrated that even if a nerve is not transected or injured, traction or compression of a peripheral nerve may induce ischemia, which can be monitored using MEP. Although MEP alone was not able to predict postoperative transient sensory or motor deficits, the combination of MEP with other methods of neurological monitoring may improve accuracy and should be investigated in future studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enucleation; ischemia; monitoring; motor-evoked potential; neurological deficit; schwannoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 29844829      PMCID: PMC5958791          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  21 in total

1.  Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in 17 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Impact of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spine deformity and potential risk factors for neurological monitoring changes.

Authors:  Bin Feng; Guixing Qiu; Jianxiong Shen; Jianguo Zhang; Ye Tian; Shugang Li; Hong Zhao; Yu Zhao
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-06

3.  Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy.

Authors:  Dapeng Fan; Daniel M Schwartz; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  F Pastorelli; M Di Silvestre; R Plasmati; R Michelucci; T Greggi; A Morigi; M R Bacchin; S Bonarelli; A Cioni; F Vommaro; N Fini; F Lolli; P Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Benign neural sheath tumours of major nerves: characteristics in 119 surgical cases.

Authors:  M Artico; L Cervoni; V Wierzbicki; V D'Andrea; F Nucci
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Peripheral nerve schwannomas--an analysis of 16 patients.

Authors:  J Oberle; J Kahamba; H P Richter
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: is it safe?

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Anthony K Sestokas; John P Dormans; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand; John M Flynn; P Mark Li; Suken A Shah; William Welch; Denis S Drummond; Todd J Albert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A new alarm point of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: a prospective multicenter study from the Spinal Cord Monitoring Working Group of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Sho Kobayashi; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kenichi Shinomiya; Shigenori Kawabata; Muneharu Ando; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Takanori Saito; Masahito Takahashi; Zenya Ito; Akio Muramoto; Yasushi Fujiwara; Kazunobu Kida; Kei Yamada; Kanichiro Wada; Naoya Yamamoto; Kazuhiko Satomi; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-11-15

9.  Relationship between evoked potentials and clinical status in spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Y Kai; J H Owen; B T Allen; M Dobras; C Davis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The need to add motor evoked potential monitoring to somatosensory and electromyographic monitoring in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.