| Literature DB >> 23881131 |
Su Sin Chong1, A R Abdul Aziz, Sulaiman W Harun.
Abstract
Demand for online and real-time measurements techniques to meet environmental regulation and treatment compliance are increasing. However the conventional techniques, which involve scheduled sampling and chemical analysis can be expensive and time consuming. Therefore cheaper and faster alternatives to monitor wastewater characteristics are required as alternatives to conventional methods. This paper reviews existing conventional techniques and optical and fibre optic sensors to determine selected wastewater characteristics which are colour, Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD). The review confirms that with appropriate configuration, calibration and fibre features the parameters can be determined with accuracy comparable to conventional method. With more research in this area, the potential for using FOS for online and real-time measurement of more wastewater parameters for various types of industrial effluent are promising.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23881131 PMCID: PMC3758615 DOI: 10.3390/s130708640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Wastewater pollution parameters: colour, COD, BOD and their conventional detection methods.
| Colour | Visual comparison |
Visually compared to evaluate the standard. | [ | |
| Spectrophotometric |
Determined from the light transmission characteristics. | [ | ||
| Colour | Tri-stimulus filter |
A limited number of wideband spectral energy readings are taken along the visible spectrum. | [ | |
| ADMI tri-stimulus Filter Method (3 wavelength (WL) and 31 WL ADMI |
An extension of tri-stimulus method. It is based on the use of the Adams-Nickerson chromatic value formula. | 100 to 10,000 ADMI | [ | |
| COD | Open Reflux Method |
Water sample oxidized with excess amount of Cr2O2−7 for 2 hours in strong acidic condition with heat supplied to determine residual Cr2O2−7 to quantify wastewater COD. Suitable for a wide range of wastes. | 5 to 50 mg O2/L and exceed than 50 mg O2/L | [ |
| Closed Reflux, Titrimetric and Colorimetri Method |
Refer to “Open Reflux Method”. This method is more economical in the use of metallic salt reagents. | 40 and 400 mg/L | [ | |
| COD | Ultrasonic digestion |
Sample digestion using sonication. | 100, 200 and 610 mg/L. 5 to 20% less than the reference. | [ |
| Microwave digestion |
Sample digestion using microwave. | 77.8 to 776.5 ± 5.9 mg O2/L | [ | |
| Energy to saving heating |
Utilises electromagnetic induction heating. | 4 to 200 mg/L ± 3.5% | [ | |
| Photolysis |
Using hydrogen peroxide or luminal for oxidizing organic compound. | 100 to 1,300 mg/L | [ | |
| Respirometric |
Needs 5 to 7 days incubation in the dark. | Up to 300 ± 2 mg/L | [ | |
| BOD | Microbial sensor |
Using isolated bacterium in polyvinyl alcohol. | 2 to 200 mg/L | [ |
| BOD | Potentiometric stripping analysis |
Oxidation of species previously deposited on an electrode. | [ | |
| Incubation in acidified permanganate |
Reducing the incubation period to 20 min at 60 °C | 7 to 330 mg/L | [ |
The basic optical sensor topologies are built up with light source, fibre, and detector.
| Optical Fibre | Single mode fibre |
Core diameter: 9 μm Cladding diameter: 125 μm | [ |
| Multimode fibre |
Step index fibres which core is uniform refractive index medium Core diameter: 50 to 85 μm Cladding diameter: 125 μm Gradient index fibres which core transverse refractive index variation nearly parabolic. Core diameter: 50 to 85 μm Cladding diameter: 125 μm It can couple large amount of light and is easy to handle both arising from its large core size. | [ | |
| Silica cavity fibre |
A resonant optical cavity is allows a beam of light to circulate in a closed path. | [ | |
| Hollow cavity fibre |
Structure comprises skin layer, porous support layer and fibre bore. | [ | |
| Plastic fibres |
Fibres made from polymer materials such as PMMA. Core diameter: ∼1 mm Cladding diameter: μm | [ | |
| Light Source | Light emitting diodes |
Low coherence length, broad spectral width, low sensitivity to back reflect light and high reliability. | [ |
| Laser diodes |
Exhibit high coherence, narrow line width and high optical output power, and more expensive. | [ | |
| Light Source | Super-radiant diodes |
Operating properties between LED and LD and exhibit high power, low coherence device. | [ |
| He-Ne laser |
Relatively low cost and ease of operation compared to other visible lasers producing beams of similar quality in terms of spatial coherence. | [ | |
| Detectors | Semiconductor photodiodes |
Good for visible and near IR wavelengths. There is no bandwidth limitation due to the detector as such. | [ |
| Avalanche photodiodes |
Sense low light levels due to the inherent gain because of avalanche multiplication, but need large supply voltage (100 V). | [ |
Figure 1.Extrinsic FOS (adapted from [31]).
Figure 2.Intrinsic FOS (adapted from [31]).
Figure 3.Basic fibre sensor system configuration (adapted from [32]).
Figure 4.Design of fibre optics sensors.
Figure 5.Structure of an intrinsic fibre optic sensing part (adapted from [52]).
Figure 6.Schematic working principles with transmissive or reflective detection of (a) FBG and (b) LPG [53].
Figure 7.Fibre optics sensors array with few types of geometries etched fibre for sensing purpose, there are including (a) De-claded OF; (b) Tapered OF; (c) Tip OF and (d) U-bent OF (adapted from [62]).
Losses in silica glass due to presence of 1 ppm of different metals and OH− ions as impurities.
| Ni2+ | 0.10 | [ |
| Fe3+ | 0.15 | [ |
| Cu2+ | 1.10 | [ |
| Cr3+ | 1.60 | [ |
| OH− (water) | 4.00 | [ |
Typical wavelength dependence of attenuation for a silica fibre.
| 850 | 1.70 | [ |
| 1,300 | 0.35 | [ |
| 1,550 | 0.15 | [ |
| 1,625 | 0.21 | [ |
Overview of the optical and fibre optic sensing for Color, COD and BOD detection.
| Color | Direct determination | 514.5 | 1000 | Optical (Absorption-Based) | 5 min | Sample handling | Dyed fibres | [ |
| Color | Leather Dye Mixture Color (Red-Blue-Yellow) | 400 to 900 | Differentiate mixture of color, errors5.6 to10.7 and 6.9 to12.5% | Optical (Absorption-Based) | Once the PLSR method is optimized, new samples can be determined. | Sample handling | Leather dye detection | [ |
| Color | Indigo Solution | 635 | 800 to 12000, errors 0.5% | Optical (Absorption-Based) | 15 min | Real time monitoring | Denim yarn | [ |
| Color | Red, Amber, Blue solution | 300 to 900 | 36 to1000, errors 1% | FOS | 10 spectra were taken and averaged | Sample handling | Textile industry-dye bath | [ |
| COD | Direct determination | 254 & 356 | 0 to360 ± 1.8 | Optical (Absorption-Based) | ∼2 min | Sample handling | Printing and dyeing wastewater | [ |
| COD | Direct determination | excitation wavelengths from 250 to 600 | 13 to 456 ± 6% | Optical (Synchronous Fluorescence) | Standard laboratory device. | Sample handling | Waste water from urban and non-urban area | [ |
| COD | Phthalatehydrogen potassium for oxidation | near-infrared (NIR) transmission & ultraviolet absorbance (254) | 5 to 400 ± 2% | Optical (Absorption-Based) | --- | Real time monitoring | Organic pollutant | [ |
| COD | Potassium hydrogen phthalate solution | 200 to 720 | 30 to 1000 ± 1% | Optical | 5 min | Real time monitoring | Lakes, river or waste water | [ |
| COD | Direct determination | UV-220 & 254 emission spectra 300 to 550 | 1.6 to 20.6 ± 3% | Optical | -- | Real time monitoring | Urban river water | [ |
| COD | Direct determination | 258 to 380& UV | 0 to 350 ± 6% | FOS | 62 s | Real time monitoring | Wastewater quality monitoring | [ |
| BOD | Direct determination | 220 to 1,100; excitation/emission 280/350 | 0 to 400 | Optical (Absorption and Fluorescence Technique) | Standard laboratory device. | Sample handling | Sewage sample | [ |
| BOD | Direct determination | 190 to 900 | 100 to 10,000 | Optical | Standard laboratory device. | Sample handling | Dirty water, slurry water | [ |
| BOD | Direct determination | Excitation 250 to 600 nm | 5.2 to 208 ± 8% | Optical (Synchronous Fluorescence) | Standard laboratory device. | Sample handling | Waste water from urban and non-urban area | [ |
| BOD | Direct Determination | 220 to 1,100 ;excitation λ 250 to 400 nm; emission λ 300 to 550 nm | 0.5 to 25.4 ± 3% | Optical (Absorption and Flurescence) | Standard laboratory device | Sample handling | Urban river water | [ |
| BOD | Direct determination | 254 nm and fluorescence intensity 270 ∼ 300, 310 ∼ 370, 370 ∼ 400 & 400 ∼ 530 | Waste water = 6.5 to 139.9 ± 10%; River water = 1.3 to 1.9 ± 22% | Optical (Absorption and Synchronous Flurescence) | Predict BOD by using multiple regression analysis | Sample handling | River water samples wastewater treatment plant effluent | [ |
| BOD | Tris(4,7-diphenyl-l,lOphenanthroline) ruthenium(II) perchlorate; | 480, excitation 610 nm. | 3 to 110 ± 4% | FOS | 3–10 min | Rapid feedback signal, very low costs | Sewage plant effluent and municipal sewage | [ |
| BOD | Used current | 1 to 10 ± 20% | FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) | 15 min | Long-term stability, no calibration drift occurs, not affected by heavy metal ions and chlorine concentration | River Water | [ | |
| BOD | Ru(I1) polypyridyl complex | Red-excitation, Blue-emmision | -- | FOS | -- | Real time monitoring | Waste water | [ |
| BOD | Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1, 10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) dye; | Four LED blue light (460 nm) | 25 to 60 ± 14% | FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) | 15–30 min (by batch) | Sample handling | GGA, domestic and synthetic WW, OECD | [ |
| BOD | 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline Ru(dpp)32+; | Blue LED (465 nm) | 0.2 to 40 | FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) | 3.2 min | without dramatically affected by sodium chloride | Seawater | [ |
Figure 8.Optical fibre system for BOD measurement (adapted from [89]).
Figure 9.Cross-section of sensing film for BOD determination. Layer 1 is polycarbonate cover; Layer 2 is yeast immobilized in PVA; Layer 3 is charcoal acting as an optical isolator; Layer 4 is oxygen sensitive fluorescent layer; Layer 5 is inert and gas to impermeable polyester support (adapted from [85]).