| Literature DB >> 31527482 |
Yaoguang Wei1,2,3,4, Yisha Jiao1,2,3,4, Dong An1,2,3,4, Daoliang Li5,6,7,8, Wenshu Li1,2,3,4, Qiong Wei1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Dissolved oxygen is an important index to evaluate water quality, and its concentration is of great significance in industrial production, environmental monitoring, aquaculture, food production, and other fields. As its change is a continuous dynamic process, the dissolved oxygen concentration needs to be accurately measured in real time. In this paper, the principles, main applications, advantages, and disadvantages of iodometric titration, electrochemical detection, and optical detection, which are commonly used dissolved oxygen detection methods, are systematically analyzed and summarized. The detection mechanisms and materials of electrochemical and optical detection methods are examined and reviewed. Because external environmental factors readily cause interferences in dissolved oxygen detection, the traditional detection methods cannot adequately meet the accuracy, real-time, stability, and other measurement requirements; thus, it is urgent to use intelligent methods to make up for these deficiencies. This paper studies the application of intelligent technology in intelligent signal transfer processing, digital signal processing, and the real-time dynamic adaptive compensation and correction of dissolved oxygen sensors. The combined application of optical detection technology, new fluorescence-sensitive materials, and intelligent technology is the focus of future research on dissolved oxygen sensors.Entities:
Keywords: dissolved oxygen; fluorescence quenching; intelligent technologies; polarographic; sensors
Year: 2019 PMID: 31527482 PMCID: PMC6767127 DOI: 10.3390/s19183995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overview of the article framework.
Figure 2Structure diagram of the polarographic dissolved oxygen sensor probe.
Comparison of polarographic electrochemical dissolved oxygen sensors.
| Electrode | Coefficient of Correlation (Determination) | Sensitivity | Linear Response Range | Detection Limit | Response Time | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| βCDSH 1+ FeTMPyP 2 + CDAuNP 3 | 5.5 μA·L·mg−1 | 0.2–6.5 mg·L−1 | 0.02 mg·L−1 | - | [ | |
| Three electrodes: nickel–salen + platinum, SCE 4, platinum | - | 3.95–9.2 mg·L−1 | 0.71 mg·L−1 | - | [ | |
| Three electrodes: hemin, Ag, AgCl, platinum wire | 8.5 μA∙L∙mg−1 (20.7μA·cm−2) | 2–7 mg·L−1 | - | 200 s | [ | |
| Three electrodes: F-BDD 5 + boron-doped CVD 6, Ag, AgCl, Pt | 0.1422 ± 0.006 nA·μM−1 | 0–273.75 μM | 0.63 μM | 0.01 s | [ | |
| Three electrodes: RGO-Ag 7 + GCE 8, Ag, AgCl, platinum wire | 0.205 μA·μM−1 | 1–120 μM | 0.031 μM | <5 s | [ | |
| Three electrodes: RuO2, AgPd, Ag, AgCl | 0.560 μA L·mg−1 | 3–11.7 mg·L−1 | - | 4 min | [ | |
| Three electrodes: nickel–salen + platinum, SCE, platinum | - | - | 3.95–9.20 mg·L−1 | 0.17 mg·L−1 | - | [ |
1 Mono-(6-deoxy-6-mercapto)-β-cyclodextrin (βCDSH). 2 Iron(III) tetra-(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin (FeTMPyP). 3 Cyclodextrin-functionalized gold nanoparticles (CDAuNP). 4 Saturated calomel electrode (SCE). 5 Boron-doped diamond microelectrodes modified by CF4 plasma (F-BDD). 6 Chemical vapor deposition (CVD). 7 Reduced graphene oxide–silver nanoparticles (RGO-Ag). 8 Glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Here, r is the coefficient of correlation, indicating the degree of linear correlation between dissolved oxygen concentration and current intensity. R is the coefficient of determination, indicating the regression fitting degree of the curve of dissolved oxygen concentration and current intensity.
Comparison of polarographic and galvanic dissolved oxygen sensors.
| Polarographic Sensor | Galvanic Cell-Type Sensor | |
|---|---|---|
|
| High | Lower |
|
| More mature | Mature |
|
| Long polarization time (approximately 5 to 15 min) | Short response time |
|
| Long | Short (the lifetime is related to the electrode materials and redox reactions) |
|
| Polarography requires external circuits. | The galvanic method does not require external circuits. |
|
| Stronger current than the galvanic-type sensor | The current is low (generally at the μA level) |
|
| Polarographic sensors are troublesome to use outdoors | The galvanic sensor is suitable for outdoor use without an external circuit |
|
| These sensors all experience disturbances by chlorine, sulfur dioxide, iodine, bromine, electromagnetic interference, etc. | |
Figure 3Fluorescence quenching of dissolved oxygen sensor probe.
Comparison of fluorescence quenching dissolved oxygen sensors.
| Oxygen Indicator | Matrix | Emission Wavelength | Optical Fiber (yes/no, Y/N) | Sensitivity | Response Time | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PtOEP 1 | PEMA 2 | 645 nm | Y | 15 (IN2/IO2 -1) | 41 ms | [ |
| Chlorophyll–zinc complex | Silica gel | 640/680 nm | N | - | - | [ |
| [Ru(dpp)3][(4-Clph)4B]2 3 | Silica gel | 604 nm | N | 3.6 ppm (I0/I -1) | <1 s | [ |
| PtOEP | PMMA | - | Y | T0/T -1 = 1.75 | <0.8 s | [ |
| PtOEP | PMMA | 647 nm | Y | KSV = 0.022 | - | [ |
| PEMA | KSV = 0.118 | - | ||||
| PPMA 4 | KSV = 0.195 | <100 ms | ||||
| [Ru(dpp)3]Cl2 | Sol–gel | 603 nm | Y | I0/I = 3.6 | 200 ms | [ |
| Ru(bpy)3Cl2 | Silica–Ni–P composite | 603 nm | N | I0/I100 = 2.49 | 300 s | [ |
| PtTFPP 5 and dye-entrapped core–shell silica nanoparticles | TEOS 6/C8 TEOS | 650 nm | Y | I0/I = 117 (0–40 mg/L) | 694 s | [ |
| Ru(dpp)32+ | TMOS 7/DiMe-DMOS 8 | 592 nm | N | I0/I = 16 (0–100%) | 100 s | [ |
| PdTFPP | Octyl-triEOS/TEOS sol-gel | 643 nm | Y | 0.0554 (40 °C) | 11 s | [ |
| PtOEP | 676 nm | 0.12 (40 °C) | 10 s | |||
| Ru(dpp)32+ | 590 nm | 0.0015 (40 °C) | 10 s |
1 Luminophore-platinum-octaethyl-porphyrin (PtOEP). 2 Poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA). 3 Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1, 10- phenanthroline)ruthenium(II) ditetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate ([Ru(dpp)3][(4-Clph)4B]2). 4 Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA); poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA); poly(propyl methacrylate) (PPMA). 5 5,10,15,20-tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) 21H, 23H-porphine palladium(II) (PdTFPP). 6 Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS). 7 Tetramethoxysilane (TMOS). 8 Dimethyldimethoxysilane (DiMe-DMOS).
Comparison of three methods for the determination of dissolved oxygen.
| Winkler Method | Clark Method | Fluorescence Quenching Method | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| As a benchmark method, the Winkler method has the highest detection accuracy. | The detection accuracy is good but is easily affected by water quality and electromagnetic interference. | The fluorescence quenching method is hardly affected by the water quality and has a high anti-electromagnetic interference ability; thus, the detection accuracy is high. |
|
| The Winkler method is a laboratory method that is complex and takes the longest time. | The Clark method requires the polarization of the electrode (approximately 5 to 15 min), so the response time is long. | The fluorescence quenching method has the fastest response time (up to the ms level). |
|
| The titration process consumes oxygen. | The redox reaction at the electrode consumes oxygen. | The fluorescence quenching process is reversible and does not consume oxygen. |
|
| The Winkler method cannot easily achieve remote measurement and, usually, water samples must be analyzed in the laboratory. | The Clark method can achieve remote detection, but the signal transmission will be distorted; thus, the detection results are not accurate. | The fluorescence quenching method can use an optical fiber to transmit signals, with a low signal loss and long transmission distance, and can achieve remote detection (optical fibers can be up to 20 m long). |
|
| No | The sensor-based Clark method requires frequent maintenance. | The sensor-based fluorescence quenching method does not require constant maintenance. |
|
| Water turbidity, nitrite, iron ions, free chlorine, etc. | H2S, SO2, pH, electromagnetic interference, etc. | Cl2, etc. |
|
| Laboratory and fewer samples. | Agriculture, forestry and fishing, biological medicine, etc. | Agriculture, forestry and fishing, life sciences, strong electromagnetic interference, and other harsh environments. |
|
| - | Low cost, wide application. | Large market share and high demand. |
Figure 4The signal processing flow of the intelligent dissolved oxygen sensor.
Figure 5Signal processing module based on the fluorescence lifetime detection principle.
Comparison of adaptive dynamic compensation correction sensors.
| Hardware | Software | Deviation (Precision) | Detection Range | Response Time | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T 1 | S 2 | P 3 | |||||
| Y | Y | Y | N | ±0.2 mg/L | 0–20 mg/L (0–40 °C) | - | [ |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | ≤±5% | 0–15 mg/L (0–60 °C) | - | [ |
| Y | Y | N | N | ≤±5% | - | - | [ |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | 0.1 mg/L | 0–20 mg/L (0–45 °C) | <10 s | [ |
| Y | Y | N | N | <1 μg/L (<3%) | - | <120 s | [ |
| Y | Y | N | N | ±0.1 mg/L (0.5%) | 0–20 mg/L | - | [ |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | Relative standard deviation (RSD) <2% (0.01 mg/L) | 0–20 mg/L | <3 min | [ |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | ±0.07 mg/L | 0–20 mg/L | - | [ |
| Y | Y | Y | Y | <1% | 0–20 mg/L | - | [ |
1 Temperature. 2 Salinity. 3 Pressure.
Intelligent dissolved oxygen sensor products.
| Company | Product | Principle | Temperature Compensation | Salinity Compensation | Pressure Compensation | Accuracy | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aanderaa | 4835 | luminescence quenching | The sensor has a thermistor to realize automatic temperature compensation. | Salinity compensation is required when salinity changes are >1 mS/cm. | Salinity compensation is required for pressure >100 m. | <8 µM | <10 s |
| 4831/4831F | <2 µM | <2s | |||||
| 4531 | <8 µM | <2 s | |||||
| WTW | TriOxmatic 700 IQ | Polarographic | The sensor has a built-in NTC 1 to realize automatic temperature compensation (−5 to 60 °C). | Manually set compensation for 0–70 ppt. | Automatic compensation. | ±0.1 mg/L | 180 s |
| TriOxmatic 702 IQ | ±0.01 mg/L | 30 s | |||||
| FDO 700 IQ | Luminescence quenching | The sensor has a built-in NTC to realize automatic temperature compensation (−5 to 50 °C). | When the salinity is >0.1%, salinity compensation is carried out. | ±0.05 mg/L | <150 s | ||
| FDO 701 IQ | ±0.1 mg/L | < 60 s | |||||
| Mettler | SG9 | Fluorescence quenching | The sensor has a built-in NTC to realize automatic temperature compensation. | When the salinity is >1 ppt, manually input the salinity value and automatically compensate for the salinity (0–42 ppt). | The sensor has a barometer to automatically or manually compensate for atmospheric pressure. | ±0.1 mg/L | - |
| SG6 | ±0.5% mg/L | 90 s | |||||
| HACH | HACH LDOTM HQ10 | Fluorescence quenching | Sensor with 30 kΩ thermistor for automatic compensation (0–50 °C). | Automatic compensation (0–70‰). | Automatic compensation (400–1100 mBar). | ±0.1 mg/L | < 30 s |
| HQ30d | The sensor has a built-in NTC to realize automatic temperature compensation. | The salinity measured by the conductivity electrode is automatically compensated. | Automatic pressure compensation. | - | - | ||
| Sea-Bird Scientific | SBE 43 | Polarography | Due to the serious drift caused by dirt pollution, the temperature, salinity, and air pressure are compensated by the calibration formula. | - | - | ||
| SBE 63 | Fluorescence quenching | Each SBE 63 is calibrated individually in a temperature-controlled bath. | Salinity and pressure impacts on sensor response are each checked at two separate points. | 0.1 mg/L | <6 s | ||
| YSI | EcoSense ODO200 | Fluorescence quenching | Automatic temperature compensation. | Manually enter the salinity value to compensate | Manually input the pressure value to compensate (contained barometer) | ±0.15 mg/L | - |
| Pro20 | Electrochemistry principle | All cable assemblies have built-in temperature sensors. | Manually set compensation for 0–70 ppt. | Automatic barometric pressure compensation. | ±0.2 mg/L | 8 s | |
| ProSolo ODO | Fluorescence quenching | Built-in thermistors for temperature compensation (−5 to 50 °C) | Manually input the salinity value; the sensor allows real-time salinity compensation. | The sensor has a barometer. | ±0.1 mg/L (0–20 mg/L) | - | |
| Kongsberg | CONTROS HydroFlash® O2 | Fluorescence quenching | - | - | - | ±1% | <3 s |
| OxyGuard | Handy Polaris | Galvanic type | Self-temperature compensation. | Set the salinity value manually for automatic compensation (0–59 ppt). | - | ±1% | <20 s |
1 NTC: negative temperature coefficient.