Literature DB >> 23873868

Numerical quadrature and operator splitting in finite element methods for cardiac electrophysiology.

Shankarjee Krishnamoorthi1, Mainak Sarkar, William S Klug.   

Abstract

We study the numerical accuracy and computational efficiency of alternative formulations of the finite element solution procedure for the monodomain equations of cardiac electrophysiology, focusing on the interaction of spatial quadrature implementations with operator splitting and examining both nodal and Gauss quadrature methods and implementations that mix nodal storage of state variables with Gauss quadrature. We evaluate the performance of all possible combinations of 'lumped' approximations of consistent capacitance and mass matrices. Most generally, we find that quadrature schemes and lumped approximations that produce decoupled nodal ionic equations allow for the greatest computational efficiency, this being afforded through the use of asynchronous adaptive time-stepping of the ionic state variable ODEs. We identify two lumped approximation schemes that exhibit superior accuracy, rivaling that of the most expensive variationally consistent implementations. Finally, we illustrate some of the physiological consequences of discretization error in electrophysiological simulation relevant to cardiac arrhythmia and fibrillation. These results suggest caution with the use of semi-automated free-form tetrahedral and hexahedral meshing algorithms available in most commercially available meshing software, which produce nonuniform meshes having a large distribution of element sizes.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac electrophysiology; finite element methods; operator splitting

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873868      PMCID: PMC4519349          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  20 in total

1.  An advanced algorithm for solving partial differential equation in cardiac conduction.

Authors:  Z Qu; A Garfinkel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Efficient solution of ordinary differential equations modeling electrical activity in cardiac cells.

Authors:  J Sundnes; G T Lines; A Tveito
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  A space-time adaptive method for simulating complex cardiac dynamics.

Authors:  E M Cherry; H S Greenside; C S Henriquez
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-02-07       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions.

Authors:  Edward J Vigmond; Felipe Aguel; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Solving the cardiac bidomain equations for discontinuous conductivities.

Authors:  Travis M Austin; Mark L Trew; Andrew J Pullan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  An efficient numerical technique for the solution of the monodomain and bidomain equations.

Authors:  Jonathan P Whiteley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Physiology driven adaptivity for the numerical solution of the bidomain equations.

Authors:  Jonathan P Whiteley
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model.

Authors:  K H W J ten Tusscher; A V Panfilov
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  A simulation study of the effects of cardiac anatomy in ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Fagen Xie; Zhilin Qu; Junzhong Yang; Ali Baher; James N Weiss; Alan Garfinkel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. I. Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes.

Authors:  C H Luo; Y Rudy
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  11 in total

1.  The Living Heart Project: A robust and integrative simulator for human heart function.

Authors:  Brian Baillargeon; Nuno Rebelo; David D Fox; Robert L Taylor; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Eur J Mech A Solids       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.220

2.  Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.

Authors:  Giulio Del Corso; Roberto Verzicco; Francesco Viola
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Incorporating inductances in tissue-scale models of cardiac electrophysiology.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Semi-implicit Non-conforming Finite-Element Schemes for Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Framework for Mesh-Coarsening Heart Simulations.

Authors:  Javiera Jilberto; Daniel E Hurtado
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Regional segmentation of ventricular models to achieve repolarization dispersion in cardiac electrophysiology modeling.

Authors:  L E Perotti; S Krishnamoorthi; N P Borgstrom; D B Ennis; W S Klug
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  The importance of mechano-electrical feedback and inertia in cardiac electromechanics.

Authors:  Francisco Sahli Costabal; Felipe A Concha; Daniel E Hurtado; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  A Computational Study of the Electrophysiological Substrate in Patients Suffering From Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  S Pagani; L Dede'; A Frontera; M Salvador; L R Limite; A Manzoni; F Lipartiti; G Tsitsinakis; A Hadjis; P Della Bella; A Quarteroni
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  High-order finite element methods for cardiac monodomain simulations.

Authors:  Kevin P Vincent; Matthew J Gonzales; Andrew K Gillette; Christopher T Villongco; Simone Pezzuto; Jeffrey H Omens; Michael J Holst; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Simulation Methods and Validation Criteria for Modeling Cardiac Ventricular Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Shankarjee Krishnamoorthi; Luigi E Perotti; Nils P Borgstrom; Olujimi A Ajijola; Anna Frid; Aditya V Ponnaluri; James N Weiss; Zhilin Qu; William S Klug; Daniel B Ennis; Alan Garfinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electrophysiology of Heart Failure Using a Rabbit Model: From the Failing Myocyte to Ventricular Fibrillation.

Authors:  Aditya V S Ponnaluri; Luigi E Perotti; Michael Liu; Zhilin Qu; James N Weiss; Daniel B Ennis; William S Klug; Alan Garfinkel
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.