Literature DB >> 23864103

Clinical feasibility of noninvasive visualization of lymphatic flow with principles of spin labeling MR imaging: implications for lymphedema assessment.

Swati Rane1, Paula M C Donahue, Ted Towse, Sheila Ridner, Michael Chappell, John Jordi, John Gore, Manus J Donahue.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To extend a commonly used noninvasive arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance (MR) imaging method for measuring blood flow to evaluate lymphatic flow.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All volunteers (n = 12) provided informed consent in accordance with institutional review board and HIPAA regulations. Quantitative relaxation time (T1 and T2) measurements were made in extracted human lymphatic fluid at 3.0 T. Guided by these parameters, an arterial spin labeling MR imaging approach was adapted to measure lymphatic flow (flow-alternating inversion-recovery lymphatic water labeling, 3 × 3 × 5 mm) in healthy subjects (n = 6; mean age, 30 years ± 1 [standard deviation]; recruitment duration, 2 months). Lymphatic flow velocity was quantified by performing spin labeling measurements as a function of postlabeling delay time and by measuring time to peak signal intensity in axillary lymph nodes. Clinical feasibility was evaluated in patients with stage II lymphedema (three women; age range, 43-64 years) and in control subjects with unilateral cuff-induced lymphatic stenosis (one woman, two men; age range, 31-35 years).
RESULTS: Mean T1 and T2 relaxation times of lymphatic fluid at 3.0 T were 3100 msec ± 160 (range, 2930-3210 msec; median, 3200 msec) and 610 msec ± 12 (range, 598-618 msec; median, 610 msec), respectively. Healthy lymphatic flow (afferent vessel to axillary node) velocity was 0.61 cm/min ± 0.13 (n = 6). A reduction (P < .005) in lymphatic flow velocity in the affected arms of patients and the affected arms of healthy subjects with manipulated cuff-induced flow reduction was observed. The ratio of unaffected to affected axilla lymphatic velocity (1.24 ± 0.18) was significantly (P < .005) higher than the left-to-right ratio in healthy subjects (0.91 ± 0.18).
CONCLUSION: This work provides a foundation for clinical investigations whereby lymphedema etiogenesis and therapies may be interrogated without exogenous agents and with clinically available imaging equipment. Online supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23864103      PMCID: PMC4485559          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

1.  Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Chekesha Clingman; Xavier Golay; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Imaging of the lymphatic system: new horizons.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Cerebral blood flow, blood volume, and oxygen metabolism dynamics in human visual and motor cortex as measured by whole-brain multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Jakob U Blicher; Leif Østergaard; David A Feinberg; Bradley J MacIntosh; Karla L Miller; Matthias Günther; Peter Jezzard
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Novel MRI approaches for assessing cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Megan K Strother; Jeroen Hendrikse
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Flow velocity of single lymphatic capillaries in human skin.

Authors:  M Fischer; U K Franzeck; I Herrig; U Costanzo; S Wen; M Schiesser; U Hoffmann; A Bollinger
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-01

6.  Morbidity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) alone versus SLN and completion axillary lymph node dissection after breast cancer surgery: a prospective Swiss multicenter study on 659 patients.

Authors:  Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reliability and predictive value of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database nomenclature and grading system for cellular rejection of liver allografts.

Authors:  A J Demetris; E C Seaberg; K P Batts; L D Ferrell; J Ludwig; R S Markin; S H Belle; K Detre
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  Lymphedema: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Anne G Warren; Håkan Brorson; Loren J Borud; Sumner A Slavin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Quantitative MRI of cerebral arterial blood volume.

Authors:  Tae Kim; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2011-11-04

10.  Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial.

Authors:  María Torres Lacomba; María José Yuste Sánchez; Alvaro Zapico Goñi; David Prieto Merino; Orlando Mayoral del Moral; Ester Cerezo Téllez; Elena Minayo Mogollón
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-12
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Imaging the lymphatic system.

Authors:  Lance L Munn; Timothy P Padera
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.514

2.  Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Katherine G Hartley; Aditi A Desai; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Assessment of lymphatic impairment and interstitial protein accumulation in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema using CEST MRI.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Paula C M Donahue; Swati Rane; Christopher R Thompson; Megan K Strother; Allison O Scott; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  3.0 T relaxation time measurements of human lymph nodes in adults with and without lymphatic insufficiency: Implications for magnetic resonance lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M Donahue; Vaughn G Braxton; Allison O Scott; Helen B Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  CEST MRI quantification procedures for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema therapy evaluation.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Bilateral Changes in Deep Tissue Environment After Manual Lymphatic Drainage in Patients with Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema.

Authors:  Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Aditi Desai; Seth A Smith; John Jordi; Ingrid M Meszoely; Ana M Grau; Rondi M Kauffmann; Raeshell S Sweeting; Kandace Spotanski; Sheila H Ridner; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 7.  Bridging the divide between pathogenesis and detection in lymphedema.

Authors:  J Brandon Dixon; Michael J Weiler
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 8.  Lymphedema following cancer therapy: overview and options.

Authors:  Michael Bernas; Saskia R J Thiadens; Betty Smoot; Jane M Armer; Paula Stewart; Jay Granzow
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 9.  Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Krishna K Machavaram; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging and bioimpedance evaluation of lymphatic abnormalities in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Chelsea Lee; Maria Garza; Niral J Patel; Kalen J Petersen; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.