Literature DB >> 17191764

Imaging of the lymphatic system: new horizons.

Tristan Barrett1, Peter L Choyke, Hisataka Kobayashi.   

Abstract

The lymphatic system is a complex network of lymph vessels, lymphatic organs and lymph nodes. Traditionally, imaging of the lymphatic system has been based on conventional imaging methods like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whereby enlargement of lymph nodes is considered the primary diagnostic criterion for disease. This is particularly true in oncology, where nodal enlargement can be indicative of nodal metastases or lymphoma. CT and MRI on their own are, however, anatomical imaging methods. Newer imaging methods such as positron emission tomography (PET), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) provide a functional assessment of node status. None of these techniques is capable of detecting flow within the lymphatics and, thus, several intra-lymphatic imaging methods have been developed. Direct lymphangiography is an all-but-extinct method of visualizing the lymphatic drainage from an extremity using oil-based iodine contrast agents. More recently, interstitially injected intra-lymphatic imaging, such as lymphoscintigraphy, has been used for lymphedema assessment and sentinel node detection. Nevertheless, radionuclide-based imaging has the disadvantage of poor resolution. This has lead to the development of novel systemic and interstitial imaging techniques which are minimally invasive and have the potential to provide both structural and functional information; this is a particular advantage for cancer imaging, where anatomical depiction alone often provides insufficient information. At present the respective role each modality plays remains to be determined. Indeed, multi-modal imaging may be more appropriate for certain lymphatic disorders. The field of lymphatic imaging is ever evolving, and technological advances, combined with the development of new contrast agents, continue to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17191764     DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  42 in total

Review 1.  Preclinical lymphatic imaging.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Gang Niu; Guangming Lu; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Magnetic resonance lymphangiography with a nano-sized gadolinium-labeled dendrimer in small and large animal models.

Authors:  Laureen M Sena; Steven J Fishman; Kathy J Jenkins; Heng Xu; Martin W Brechbiel; Celeste A S Regino; Nobuyuki Kosaka; Marcelino Bernardo; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.307

3.  Automated measurement of lymph nodes: a phantom study.

Authors:  Sebastian Keil; Cedric Plumhans; Florian F Behrendt; Sven Stanzel; Michael Suehling; Georg Mühlenbruch; Andreas H Mahnken; Rolf W Günther; Marco Das
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Label-free optical lymphangiography: development of an automatic segmentation method applied to optical coherence tomography to visualize lymphatic vessels using Hessian filters.

Authors:  Siavash Yousefi; Jia Qin; Zhongwei Zhi; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Label-free optical imaging of lymphatic vessels within tissue beds in vivo.

Authors:  Siavash Yousefi; Zhongwei Zhi; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.544

Review 6.  New horizons for imaging lymphatic function.

Authors:  Ruchi Sharma; Juliet A Wendt; John C Rasmussen; Kristen E Adams; Milton V Marshall; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 7.  Imaging the lymphatic system.

Authors:  Lance L Munn; Timothy P Padera
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.514

8.  Minimally invasive method for determining the effective lymphatic pumping pressure in rats using near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Ryan E Akin; Michael J Weiler; Timothy Kassis; Jeffrey A Kornuta; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 9.  Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats.

Authors:  Michelle Longmire; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 10.  Clinical implications of near-infrared fluorescence imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kosaka; Mikako Ogawa; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.