Literature DB >> 31631410

CEST MRI quantification procedures for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema therapy evaluation.

Rachelle Crescenzi1, Paula M C Donahue2,3, Helen Mahany1, Sarah K Lants1, Manus J Donahue1,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast in upper extremities of participants with lymphedema before and after standardized lymphatic mobilization therapy using correction procedures for B0 and B1 heterogeneity, and T1 relaxation.
METHODS: Females with (n = 12) and without (n = 17) breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) matched for age and body mass index were scanned at 3.0T MRI. B1 efficiency and T1 were calculated in series with chemical exchange saturation transfer in bilateral axilla (B1 amplitude = 2µT, Δω = ±5.5 ppm, slices = 9, spatial resolution = 1.8 × 1.47 × 5.5 mm3 ). B1 dispersion measurements (B1 = 1-3 µT; increment = 0.5 µT) were performed in controls (n = 6 arms in 3 subjects). BCRL participants were scanned pre- and post-manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) therapy. Chemical exchange saturation transfer amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) metrics corrected for B1 efficiency were calculated, including proton transfer ratio (PTR'), magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry ( M T R asymmetry ' ) , and apparent exchange-dependent relaxation (AREX'). Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate relationships between metrics in BCRL participants pre- versus post-MLD (two-sided P < 0.05 required for significance).
RESULTS: B1 dispersion experiments showed nonlinear dependence of Z-values on B1 efficiency in the upper extremities; PTR' showed < 1% mean fractional difference between subject-specific and group-level correction procedures. PTR'APT significantly correlated with T1 (Spearman's rho = 0.57, P < 0.001) and body mass index (Spearman's rho = -0.37, P = 0.029) in controls and with lymphedema stage (Spearman's rho = 0.48, P = 0.017) in BCRL participants. Following MLD therapy, PTR'APT significantly increased in the affected arm of BCRL participants (pre- vs. post-MLD: 0.41 ± 0.05 vs. 0.43 ± 0.03, P = 0.02), consistent with treatment effects from mobilized lymphatic fluid.
CONCLUSION: Chemical exchange saturation transfer metrics, following appropriate correction procedures, respond to lymphatic mobilization therapies and may have potential for evaluating treatments in participants with secondary lymphedema.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B1 correction; CEST; MRI; arms; lymph; lymphedema; manual lymphatic drainage; protein; therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31631410      PMCID: PMC6982565          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  44 in total

1.  Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Stanley G Rockson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Lymphedema evaluation using noninvasive 3T MR lymphangiography.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Katherine G Hartley; Aditi A Desai; Allison O Scott; Vaughn Braxton; Helen Mahany; Sarah K Lants; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Assessment of lymphatic impairment and interstitial protein accumulation in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema using CEST MRI.

Authors:  Manus J Donahue; Paula C M Donahue; Swati Rane; Christopher R Thompson; Megan K Strother; Allison O Scott; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tracey DiSipio; Sheree Rye; Beth Newman; Sandi Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Z-spectrum appearance and interpretation in the presence of fat: Influence of acquisition parameters.

Authors:  Shu Zhang; Jochen Keupp; Xinzeng Wang; Ivan Dimitrov; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The incidence and risk factors of related lymphedema for breast cancer survivors post-operation: a 2-year follow-up prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Li Zou; Feng-Hua Liu; Pei-Pei Shen; Yan Hu; Xiao-Qian Liu; Ying-Ying Xu; Qi-Liang Pen; Bei Wang; Ya-Qun Zhu; Ye Tian
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 7.  Sodium selenite and cancer related lymphedema: Biological and pharmacological effects.

Authors:  Christina Pfister; Horst Dawzcynski; Franz-Josef Schingale
Journal:  J Trace Elem Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.849

8.  Skin infections and antibiotic stewardship: analysis of emergency department prescribing practices, 2007-2010.

Authors:  Daniel J Pallin; Carlos A Camargo; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-01-06

Review 9.  Chronic radiation-induced dermatitis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Mateusz Spałek
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2016-12-09

10.  Lipidomic Profiling of Adipose Tissue Reveals an Inflammatory Signature in Cancer-Related and Primary Lymphedema.

Authors:  Lisa M Sedger; Dedreia L Tull; Malcolm J McConville; David P De Souza; Thusitha W T Rupasinghe; Spencer J Williams; Saravanan Dayalan; Daniel Lanzer; Helen Mackie; Thomas C Lam; John Boyages
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Elevated magnetic resonance imaging measures of adipose tissue deposition in women with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Maria Garza; Chelsea A Lee; Niral J Patel; Victoria Gonzalez; R Sky Jones; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and bioimpedance evaluation of lymphatic abnormalities in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Paula M C Donahue; Rachelle Crescenzi; Chelsea Lee; Maria Garza; Niral J Patel; Kalen J Petersen; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of therapeutic response in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Jorge Forte; Daniel Boczar; Salam Kassis; Maria T Huayllani; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 4.  A Brief History and Future Prospects of CEST MRI in Clinical Non-Brain Tumor Imaging.

Authors:  Tianxin Gao; Chuyue Zou; Yifan Li; Zhenqi Jiang; Xiaoying Tang; Xiaolei Song
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.