Literature DB >> 23860902

Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study.

Sergio Alexandre Gehrke1, Miriam Souza Dos Santos Vianna, Berenice Anina Dedavid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present in vitro study was to assess resistance to static fatigue of implants with different connections at various insertion levels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty implants and abutments were used with the smallest diameter of each model. Four groups (n = 15) were created on the basis of the implant design and connection: cylindrical external hexagon Ø3.30 mm (group 1), cylindrical internal hexagon Ø3.30 mm (group 2), conical internal hexagon Ø3.50 mm (group 3), and conical Morse taper Ø3.50 mm (group 4). Three insertion levels in resin were tested, 0 mm at the platform level (l1), 3 mm (l2), and 5 mm (l3) above the platform of the resin. All groups were subjected to quasi-static loading at 30° to the implant axis in a universal machine.
RESULTS: The mean fracture strengths for group 1 were 1,991 N (l1), 1,020 N (l2), and 767 N (l3); for group 2: 2,119 N (l1), 1,034 N (l2), and 903 N (l3); for group 3: 2,373 N (l1), 1,407 N (l2), and 929 N (l3); and for group 4: 1,710 N (l1), 1,680 N (l2), and 1,182 N (l3).
CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to loading decreases significantly with the loss of insertion, and the connection design between the implants and abutments can change the performance and resistance of the system. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When implants are used in areas where there is a possibility of bone loss, the selection of a connection type is an important consideration for the longevity of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23860902     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  27 in total

1.  Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.

Authors:  R M Cibirka; S K Nelson; B R Lang; F A Rueggeberg
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Implant failure caused by screw head fractures--a new type of complication in a reconstruction plate: a case report.

Authors:  C Siegmund; R Schimming; S Swaid
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system.

Authors:  Ameen Khraisat; Akihiko Hashimoto; Shuichi Nomura; Osamu Miyakawa
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.

Authors:  Murat Sütpideler; Steven E Eckert; Mark Zobitz; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report.

Authors:  T J Balshi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Fracture mechanisms of retrieved titanium screw thread in dental implant.

Authors:  Ken'ichi Yokoyama; Tetsuo Ichikawa; Hiroki Murakami; Youji Miyamoto; Kenzo Asaoka
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Use of mini implants for replacement and immediate loading of 2 single-tooth restorations: a clinical case report.

Authors:  Azfar A Siddiqui; Mark Sosovicka; Mark Goetz
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  A retrospective evaluation of endosseous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient.

Authors:  T Pylant; R G Triplett; M C Key; M A Brunsvold
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures.

Authors:  Arturo Sánchez-Pérez; Ma José Moya-Villaescusa; Alfonso Jornet-Garcia; Santiago Gomez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2010-05-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Niloufar Mousavi; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Effect of Marginal Bone Integrity and Aftermarket Abutment Screws on Dental Implant Systems-A Preliminary Study with Finite Element Method.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Wu; Ming-Hsu Tsai; Hung-Shyong Chen; Ching-Ping Lin; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Long-Term Fatigue and Its Probability of Failure Applied to Dental Implants.

Authors:  María Prados-Privado; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos; Sérgio Alexandre Gehrke; Mariano Sánchez Siles; José Luis Calvo Guirado; José Antonio Bea
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.